What Chips Are Available?
RM Racing
[MJ] Randy told me he "used" to have the Autothority chip, but has since
developed his own and gets them through a different supplier. We will find out on the
dyno.
[CA] I am very impressed with the RM CPU upgrade, I wouldnt say it is much faster, but
you can definately feel the difference over stock, crisper throttle response, quicker,
smoother acceleration....I like it. If you have headers/exhaust , I recommend this
upgrade.
The Anders scale (5 stars max score)
| Category |
Rating |
Notes |
| Performace |
*** |
Compliments other aftermarket equipment |
| Ease of Install |
**** |
EASY! |
| Price |
** |
Kind of pricey for what you get |
| Quality |
**** |
Typical Acura/Honda |
| Overall |
***1/2 |
If you have headers and exhaust, you will like it. |
I can now spin the 275/35ZR-18's without downshifting (TCS off, will chirp very little
with TCS on).
Mark Johnson's "Chip-Off" Dyno Day
[Note: The following text, data, and graphs are posted exactly as received from Mark
Johnson of Dali Racing. It should be noted that it wasn't possible for him to test all
chips with the mods they were designed for, but the results are still interesting.]
Introduction
In this "chip-off" we were trying to see if there really were any measurable
differences in the aftermarket chips available, and if there were, if they actually
improved performance or just PEAK #'s. Those are two different animals as you shall see
from the graphs.
Several samples were rounded up from members of the list. (THANKS to all who provided
chips) One manufacturer (RM Racing) sent in a sample of their 'C' chip. These chips were
tested in May-June of '98. The DALI chip was tested in late August. All published tests
were run on the same car (my 1992, extensively modified - see below for a list of mods) or
if specified, on a '91 with an RSR exhaust (otherwise stock) owned by Raymond Wisco. All
tests were done on the same dyno (DynoJet) by the same tech at the same shop. The DynoJet
was calibrated for temperature, humidity and barometric pressure before each series of
runs. (not before each run) All runs were made in 3rd gear to ~redline.
The chips were tested as follows:
After a Baseline run with the OEM chip was recorded -
- Disconnect battery
- Remove and replace chip with aftermarket sample
- Reconnect battery
- Run to redline 2X for the ECU to "learn" the chip
- Record run #3 for charting purposes
- Rrepeat
My Mods: RM Headers, RM Exhaust, RM Intake, Comptech Internal Engine Mods
Data Notes:
If you look at the graphs you can see that most of the chips, while having some PEAK
#'s that are better than stock, do not perform that much better than the OEM tuning ! With
most increases measuring just in the 1-2% range - However, since they were consistently
higher than the OEM chip, I do think that they are valid #'s.
The "Driveability index"
The most interesting graphs to me are the "Power Chart" graphs which show the
"area under the curve" so to speak, in terms of average torque and total HP over
the rpm ranges specified. SURPRISE! ("Elementary" sez Alan W. EE extrordinaire)
Only the DALI and RM chips are an actual real world improvement over stock !! (see Power
Chart '92 - OEM as '0')
Chip-Off Graphs:
 All - Torque |
 All - Horsepower |
 OEM vs. Dali - HP |
 OEM vs. Dali - Torque |
 OEM vs. RM "C" vs. Dali - HP |
 OEM vs. RM "C" vs. Dali - Torque |
 All - "Power Factor" |
 OEM vs. Dali - Avg. Torque in stock car |
 All - Avg. Torque vs. OEM chip in Modified '92 |
 All - Avg. Torque in Modified '92 |
Chip-Off Data: