Comptech NSX Supercharger
Comptech offers a supercharger
kit for all NSX model years. The basic kit is called their "6.9 PSI"
kit. Boost is 2 PSI wide open throttle at 1200 RPM,
3 PSI wide open throttle at 2000 RPM,
6 PSI wide open throttle at 4000 RPM or higher.
No boost (cutout) at high manifold vacuum, idle to cruise RPM. Comptech also
offers a "9 PSI" kit using a different diameter pulley for a bit more
"oomph."
There are 300+ NSX supercharger kits installed and there are no known engine
failures related to the supercharger kit. As with any mechanical part, a few of
the supercharger units themselves have failed (usually bearing problems in the
blower unit), but Comptech has taken care of their customers in all these cases.
The kits for the NSX-T come with a new engine cover (which re-uses a bunch of
hardware from the factory cover) and their NSX-T billet aluminum strut tower
brace. The factory engine cover and strut tower brace from the NSX-T will not
fit with the supercharger installed. All Comptech supercharger kits are 50-state
legal and come with the required CARB E.O. emissions sticker. Estimated installation time is
8-12 hours. Some shops may be able to do it faster if they have done the kit before.
The Comptech unit is a Whipple 1600A, a Lysholm positive-displacement twin-screw
design with a displacement of 1.6L/REV (0.656 CFM/REV) and an internal
lubrication system. Typically, twin-screw superchargers, by design, have the
ability to maintain a higher volumetric and adiabatic efficiency than most roots
types. This allows the Comptech unit to provide consistent boost and compress
the intake charge very efficiently with a minimal increase in air intake
temperature. This combination helps provide almost instant boost (unlike
centrifugal and roots type superchargers) to increase and broaden the torque
curve substantially.
Whipple supercharger cutaway view |
Twin-Screw Detail |
The basic NSX Supercharger Package includes the following major parts: Whipple 6 psi.
supercharger with an intake assembly, 3.8" diameter supercharger pulley
(applicable to the 3.2 liter engine), 4.2" diameter supercharger pulley
(applicable to the 3.0 liter engine), crankshaft pulley (same diameter as
stock), in line fuel pump, PROM chip for 1991-1994 models only, and all
necessary installation hardware.
Comptech keeps the stock fuel injectors and boosts rail pressure to 100 PSI.
The 9PSI kit includes Honda high-flow injectors (Honda part #06164-POF-000).
They are not used in any US vehicles but can be ordered from Japan. The fuel
pressure regulator is a generic "Super FMU" from Vortech Engineering
and is pre-set by Comptech for their kit.
Since the installation requires the alternator to run backwards, the OEM
alternator cannot be used. In order to stick with a Honda OEM part, Comptech
uses the 1992 Honda Prelude alternator which is the only one Honda ever sold
which runs the opposite direction. It is Honda part #31100-PT3-A52RM.
The installation of the kit requires the
following modifications to the stock vehicle: The stock crankshaft pulley is
removed and replaced by a equal diameter pulley which is modified to accommodate
the supercharger drive belt, the MAP sensor wire is modified with an in-line
resistor for 1991-1994 models only, an in-line fuel pump is installed next to
the fuel filter, the stock 15 amp fuel pump fuse is replaced with a 20 amp fuse,
a resistor located on stock fuel pump is removed, and the stock intake manifold
is removed and replaced with the combination supercharger and intake manifold
configuration.
 Comptech
supercharger in an NSX coupe. |
 Comptech
supercharger in an NSX coupe. |
 Comptech
supercharger in their yellow -T bodykit car. |
 Comptech
supercharger fresh out of the box [DH] |
NSX-T supercharger kit |
NSX coupe supercharger kit |
[From the Comptech web site] "Many NSX owners mention that their car is
outstanding in handling and overall performance, but that it lacks that good old fashioned
"big-block grunt" After many months of extensive testing and engineering work,
Comptech is getting close to making available a bolt-on Comptech NSX Supercharger Kit
designed exclusively for the NSX. Their goal with the project is to offer NSX enthusiasts
a reliable (OE-quality), cost-effective method of generating maximum horsepower and
low-end torque through forced induction.
Boost is 3 psi at 2,000 RPM, with a maximum 6 psi at 4,000 RPM - generating well over
380 horsepower! Substantial power gains are achieved without the necessity and cost of
rebuilding the engine. Because superchargers require less space in the engine compartment,
the engineering on the project has allowed Comptech to retain the factory engine
compartment cover for a complete factory stock look.
The kit Includes Supercharger unit, modified intake intake manifold (exchange),
modified supercharger inlet, custom pulley assembly, alternator, special alternator
mounts, 6 rib belt, crank pulley (exchange), special fuel system plumbing, high-flow fuel
injectors & fuel rail, high-pressure fuel pump, modified electronics (exchange basis).
This is an extensive package that offers impressive power gains to the NSX's already
potent powerplant. Expected time for installation is 1-2 days shop time."

The CT supercharger uses the following belt: Goodyear Gatorback 4050705
5PK1790. It is a GM 2.0L serpentine belt. You should stick with this belt; other
belts may be cheaper but they can slip. Both the 6PSI and 9PSI setups use the
same belt. Note: The first few supercharger kits were produced using a different
pulley and had a different belt with 6-grooves as opposed to the 5 grooves on
this belt. These early kits have round fuel rails instead of square and an
intake manifold made of a factory unit with a box section welded to it instead
of a cast manifold. If you have one of these early kits, call Comptech for belt
information.

Supercharger performance data from a Comptech brochure (engine HP at the
crank - car is a 3.0L NSX with Comptech headers and exhaust):
|
RPM
|
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
4000 |
4500 |
5000 |
5500 |
6000 |
6500 |
7000 |
7500 |
8000 |
| HP |
082 |
105 |
135 |
165 |
200 |
230 |
255 |
285 |
315 |
345 |
360 |
385 |
395 |
| TORQUE |
222 |
226 |
237 |
241 |
261 |
268 |
270 |
269 |
271 |
277 |
271 |
268 |
261 |
0 to 60, 4.8 seconds
1/4 mile, 12.6 seconds
Comment: the torque curve remains very wide, similar to the unboosted engine.

[WSC] After recent modifications to the fuel system and a revamped chip from Comptech I
repeated dyno testing on my car today. At the last two track events with the new equipment
I felt that the engine had considerably better torque with less abrupt off-throttle
decceleration and the dyno confirmed my impression. The specifics are as follows:
date 1/6/99, Vinci Hi-Performance, 407-292-4500, Dynojet Model 248E
3rd gear run from 2000 rpm to 8000 rpm, temp 49 degrees F, pressure 30.27 inches of
Mercury, 2 runs
run 1 max torque 258 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm, 339hp @ 7900 rpm
run 2 max torque 258 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm, 346hp @ 8000 rpm
torque curve virtually flat between 3000 and 8000 rpm (range 228lb-ft to 258lb-ft)
The above numbers are not corrected for temperature or barometric pressure...they are
raw data collected at the rear wheels (correction factor for air pressure and temp
calculated to be .93 which would give max hp at 322).
Currently the car has the following engine mods: Comptech supercharger (revised
pulley), Comptech revised fuel pump, injector settings, Comptech airbox, Comptech headers,
Comptech competition exhaust, Comptech chip, Technomagnesio 18x10 rears with Michelin
MXX3's, 13.5 inch Brembo cross-drilled rotors, (size and mass of rear wheels/brake rotors
affects hp numbers as discussed previously)
These numbers are significantly better than the last 2 dyno runs that I made (288 and
305 max hp uncorrected). Comparing curves, the torque curve is a little flatter and higher
than on the previous runs. If losses through the power train are in the 15-20 percent
range, expected hp at the crankshaft would near the 390hp claimed by Comptech.
FINALLY....truth in advertising.

[DB] In spite of seemingly never ending El-Nino related hassles at home, I managed to
get a 1-1/2 hour drive on my newly equipped car this week. I went down some quiet
side streets and into the mountains. Basically I'm reviewing the supercharger,
airbox, and
short gears. My other mods are old.
I believe this is what the NSX always should have been. Instantaneous smooth knifelike
throttle response. It's as if the accelerator was connected to something that makes the
road go faster rather than the car, as if the car was inertialess. Never have I
experienced such zero lag power. This engine still has the good wide torque curve of VTEC,
and throttle application is just as progressive and smooth as it always was. I need never
have worried about jerky throttle response.
Naturally, the handling is unchanged and superb as always.
The strangest thing is a factor I personally would not have predicted to matter at all.
The sound, good god, the sound. From inside, the supercharger makes a sound like a
symphony of musical gears. It reminds me very much of the sound I heard on TV when they
piped a signal from inside a Mercedes CLK racecar. From outside I cannot say, I haven't
heard it that way.
In summary, *wow* is all I can think of.
The whole equipment list is as follows:
'92, 5 speed, supercharger, airbox, headers, HKS exhaust, short gears, K&N 'stock'
filter, non-compliance bushings, no spare tire, no brake splash shields, 5 point belts
both sides, fire extinguisher. Bridgestone RE010's front, S02's rear, 16/17 inch stock
wheels. The supercharger has many associated smaller but necessary mods as part of the
kit, not the least of which is a new fuel pump and different chip.
I'm doing a new tail lens. It says "NSX SC" instead of "Acura."
Next maybe I'll get rid of a little more weight. Got the new lighter battery. Maybe I'll
make an aluminum engine cover which still provides sunlight protection for the hoses and
belts.
Highway (freeway and backroads) 24 mpg
City (no freeways, just surface streets) 19 mpg
Track (Laguna Seca) 8 mpg

[DH] I am currently getting about 12-14 mpg, using 50% highway, 50% street over the
past two gas tanks. Currently have about 2000 miles on the supercharger.. But I am
hammering on it. I mean REALLY hammering on it. Every little opening in traffic it is
going to the redline. Just about every stoplight I hit 8000 RPMs in 1st, and if clear, hit
it in second.

[WSC] I have been disappointed with the overall performance of the Comptech
supercharger. I've had it for year... other than eating mufflers it hasn't lived up to
expectations. I will be looking for alternatives (such as Jackson Racing's SC) in the near
future.

[DB - 99/3/1] After a year, I'm really very happy with this setup. Cheap it's not, but
everybody knows that.
It's now one year, 10,000 miles of street driving and about four hours on the track
since I had the Comptech Supercharger installed. For informational purposes, I also had
the 'Japanese' gearset, the Comptech airbox, and the Comptech
rebuilt-modified-25%-more-clamp-force stock dual plate clutch installed at the same time.
Previously, the Comptech headers, HKS exhaust and non-compliance bushings were done.
The most interesting thing that happened was that after a few weeks, while driving to
work one day, the engine started to feel like it was seizing: the idle would just stop but
could be maintained with an unusual application of moderate throttle. There was a *nasty
noise* coming from the engine compartment. I drive very moderately on the street, so I had
no clue what might be wrong. I coasted down the hill to a gas station and phoned my
mechanic. This is a guy who owns his own NSX and takes care of 15-20 NSX's. He drove over
and started it for a few seconds, shut it down and called for a flatbed which took the car
to his shop. An hour later he phoned me that one of the supercharger bearings was seized,
and it wouldn't cost me a cent.
Comptech provided outstanding first class support; even the tow was paid for, and my
insurance would have covered that. Two days later I was back in business.
To my knowledge, this is still the only actual supercharger failure which Comptech has
suffered. It's a little amusing, because on one of our subsequent NorCal NSX events, we
visited the Comptech facilities and had a free lunch at a dealer in Sacramento. During
lunch, one of the Comptech engineers, possibly a consultant, opined that there had been no
supercharger failures. I felt it would be bad form to pipe up in front of fifty people,
"Oh yeah? There was one!," so I smiled into my salad and kept my counsel for
some other occasion such as this. Probably the guy didn't know; that would be par for the
course.
The supercharger proper is a Whipple unit, and it was returned to the factory, but
Comptech says they never got a failure report back. The internal oil supply was working
fine. The bearings supposedly went overseas for analysis. I guess I don't really care.
There were a couple of less traumatic items which were handled with varying degrees of
aplomb. One day the mechanic phoned me and said "There's a replacement pulley to put
in. They found out the material of the original design was incorrect. Why? Well it's
pretty hot there! Duuhhhhh..."
The second item is the so-called Supercharger Improvement Kit. This needs a little
explaining. The original setup had a peculiar driveability problem which I called The
Herkie-Jerkies. What happens is this: you are going slightly downhill and maintaining
speed so the throttle is closed. Then you want to pick it up and you crack open the
throttle just the tiniest bit: Whiplash! The Herkie-Jerkies! There was almost no way to
transition smoothly from throttle off to slight throttle on when the car was under
downhill force. On the level the problem was still there, but not as bad. This was an
annoyance for everyday street driving, but not bad enough to cause extreme pain.
My mechanic's car had the problem worse than mine. He influences so many Comptech sales
that they cannot afford to ignore him when he complains about something; indeed, I don't
think they want to ignore him, he is perhaps the most knowledgable beta tester they'll
ever have. Thus, presto-digitalis, the Supercharger Improvement Kit, one thousand dollars,
thank you very much.
What is it really?
Let me apologize in advance if I mis-characterize the problem; my knowledge may be
faulty.
The basic difficulty with the original system was that there are a limited number of
fuel mapping points in software, and the needs of mapping for high power levels made the
number of points at low power levels rather too few for smooth operation under all
conditions, with the supercharger. For the aftermarket designer to add more points in
software is really not reasonable; it involves significant code changes in parts of
software which have no available documentation. So they couldn't do that.
They overcame this problem by doing two basic things:
1) Replacing the stock fuel pressure regulator, which in effect had only two output
pressures, with a different diaphragm regulated unit, which reacts to manifold pressure in
a more smooth and continuous way.
2) A new fuel pump controller replaces the stock controller. The stock unit basically
controls the fuel pump to two speeds. The new unit has a semi-continuous pump speed
control function.
By these techniques they completely eliminated the problem, and the throttle response
is now very smooth at low power levels, regardless of engine loading or manifold pressure,
as far as I can tell after a few months of testing. No more Herkie-Jerkies.
A Comptech representative has commented to me that the overall high power operation may
also be improved in certain cases. That's possible, but the mechanism by which that may
happen is obscure to me.
The Comptech supercharger is now refined enough for the most demanding customer who
wants lots of power and completely smooth driveability.
Here is a presumably honest and uninflated data set on the Comptech Supercharger. The
numbers are at the rear wheels and corrected to standard temperature and pressure. The car
has the supercharger, airbox and "Supercharger Improvement Kit." There are other
non-relevant mods like brakes, etc. This was measured with a DynoJet model 248C at Frey
Racing in Mountain View, CA.
No dry ice in the intake system, heh, heh.
The engine estimated HP uses 15% estimated losses to calculate; maybe that's too much,
I don't know. I'm using Redline oil in the tranny.
| RPM |
Torque
(ft-lb) |
Rear wheel HP
(corrected) |
Engine HP
(estimated) |
| 3500 |
215 |
143 |
164 |
| 4000 |
224 |
170 |
196 |
| 4500 |
232 |
199 |
229 |
| 5000 |
228 |
217 |
250 |
| 5500 |
230 |
241 |
277 |
| 6000 |
234 |
268 |
308 |
| 6500 |
230 |
285 |
327 |
| 7000 |
226 |
301 |
346 |
| 7500 |
222 |
316 |
364 |
| 7900 |
212 |
319 |
366 |
The most noteworthy thing here is the truly remarkable flatness of the torque curve.
You will not see anything like that flatness on another high powered car. That's VTEC for
ya.
Guess what else? That's the same power to weight ratio as an unmodified Viper. Guess
what else? I saw the dyno recording of a modified Viper: 450 RWHP! There is always
somebody with more horsepower. Well, the Viper certainly wins the less-expensive
horsepower race, but it still is not my kind of car.

[MWH - 99/3/3] I was told by Comptech that the total number of superchagers sold by
them for the NSX is about 55 units. 15 of these were installed on the 3.2 liter NSX , one
of which I just bought. After a test drive and inspection, I was sold. It is of MY OPINION
that these units are worth every penny Comptech is asking! YA WHOO!!!

[MBA - 99/11/10] I sell and install CT SC kits, so most will say that my opinion is
biased. That said, I think there are allot of reasons to consider the CT kit. First, and
VERY important, is that I believe you will have a better network for service after the
install. If you have a problem with a CT product, you have basically the whole Acura
dealer network, and a few notable independents, to work with. The CT kit is simpler in
design for achieving the same results and if this is a car you drive allot, simple equals
reliable.

[CA - 99/12/1] My NSX did 322.8HP to the wheels with the stock Comptech SC pulley
(6.9psi), stock gears, RM headers, CT exhaust and Uni filter as well as KN filter ( no
difference). I did have 18in wheels, but not sure that matters. We did three runs, about
322.x consistently. The smaller pulley (9psi) was said to give about 20 more HP, but you
have to swap out the SFMU, some say you have to swap injectors as well, but I not sure.
Overall I am very impressed and pleased with the 6psi blower, there is significantly more
power in the lower rpm's.

[DB - 99/10/31] Quite a number of units have been dyno'd now. All the numbers I have
seen (4) are 320HP +/- a small amount, at the rear wheels, with the standard 6PSI boost.
Comptech's numbers from the engine test cell show 385-390 HP. I'm sure these numbers are
both accurate, which leaves a bit of mystery loss if the drivetrain is 14%, which I also
believe. So what happened to the rest? 385x.86=330. There is 10 to 15 HP which went
somewhere. If we could find it, maybe we could get it back. Early this year they
(Comptech) began a effort to resolve the issue, but the pressure of other jobs put it on
the back burner.

[NS - 99/12/23] I would like to relate my experiences with Mark Basch and the
Comptech Supercharger.
Mark Basch installed a CT supercharger on my 96 NSX-T during the past week. I am
completely impressed with his NSX knowledge, workmanship, integrity, and especially his
customer service. I deal with alot of people, with all of my hobbies, and he is one of the
top people I have had the pleasure to meet. He took time to discuss options with me
(hours, since I ask alot of questions), before I had even committed to spend any money. We
spent alot of time discussing general NSX technical information that has helped me
determine a strategy for future upgrades. Mark does all of the NSX technical work himself,
and personally stands by it. I have seen him take personal time, (outside of shop hours
and weekends) to help myself and other NSX customers with their issues. All of the work he
has done for me has been first rate, and I expect to be seeing him in the future other
goodies.
Now on the the Comptech supercharger. It is fantastic, period! My '96 was completely
stock before this work. I had Mark install a set of short gears (purchased from RM at a
fantastic price during his internet sale), and took my car to Technodyne in Tempe,
Az. for
a dyno run. Chris Cervelli is the owner and was very willing to work with us. He uses a
Dynojet 248 dyno. My car came in at corrected:
Max HP = 233.5@ 7250 rpm
Max Torque = 182.6 @ ~4400,5200 and 6500 rpm. (3 peaks, relatively flat)
After the CT supercharger was installed, using stock exhaust manifolds and stock
exhaust the corrected numbers looked like this:
Max HP = 299.8 @ 8000 rpm (I need a .2 hp increase)
Max Torque = 221.0 @ ~4500 rpm (still flat)
Total gain from the supercharger without any other goodies installed was 66.3 HP at the
rear wheels. The NSX feels like a new car. No more hole in the 1-2 shift and enough power
to give you a big grin. The HP curves showed that the SC started increasing the power from
2000 rpm (~8hp) slowly increasing the gap to 66 hp. In fact the curve was still rising all
the way to the rev limiter, (mine kicks in right at 8000 rpm). This was great; no modest
gains that you might forget about after a couple of weeks of driving.
Comptech 9 PSI Upgrade
[WSC - 99/8/19] I've had the CT supercharger in my car since early 1998. The 9psi
upgrade was installed about 3-4 months ago. I have had no reliability problems with either
the original configuration or the revised injectors, modified ECU, or the smaller
pulley/belt set-up. The car has been driven hard for about 20K miles in multiple track
events including NSXPO98 and 99.
The only minor problem is a wandering idle point especially when the car is first
started up.....it goes from just about stalling out to 1800 rpm then back down
again......haven't been able to fix this yet but it seems that increasing the idle rpm to
about 1100rpm has improved it somewhat. This began with the 9psi upgrade. It did not
happen with the original set-up.
Also for all of you who know my muffler stories, I have not had to replace a muffler
since the newest design was released late last year. I also ran the stock muffler
cross-country for 6400 miles and ran it hard at Laguna Seca with the supercharger....no
problems.

[MBA - 99/11/10] I don't recommend the 9 psi kit for a heavily used car either. I
think the wear and tear from a constant 9psi is too much. I haven't driven an
"M", but have seen Alex's car and its a good looking quality kit. I'll be
installing an "M" kit in a few weeks, as well as 2 or 3 more CT kits.

[DB - 99/10/31] With the 9PSI boost kit, you get 420 at the engine, but only time will
tell if it blows up too soon. Obviously, they're not pushing to sell that.
Possible Problems
Blown Exhaust
[WSC] As some of you know, I am on Comptech muffler #3 in the past 8 months...blown
baffles on the first 2 despite supposedly designed to withstand the supercharger. Brought
along straight pipes so I could avoid having to order muffler #4 (they've all busted after
track events)...then couldn't get the 14mm nuts of the exhaust flange (had 3 guys
try)....but lo and behold, the new muffler held up?
Rattling
[AVE - 00/1/13] So you just finished slapping on an SC on your T. Burying your foot to
engage VTEC results in a rattle sound coming from the engine bay. It does it all the time
in first, most of the time in second and sometimes in third. Hmmmm, what changes between
1st, 2nd and 3rd? The gear ratio; therefore, the torque to the rear wheels; therefore, the
rotational engine deflection in it's mounts; therefore, part A rubbing against part B.
Part A is the bronze vent on the snout of the SC, between the drive pulley and the body
of the SC. Part B is the bottom of the passenger-side strut bar. Part B is already
machined to clear the SC, but in my case, not enough. Attacking it with a cutter
attachment in a Dremel tool solved the problem by creating more clearance between part A
and part B.
Fuel Pump
[MWE - 00/1/16] I really didnt know I had a problem until I got my 94 on
the Dyno. With the CT Supercharger, RM Headers, CT High-flow cats, and CT exhaust, I am
only getting 290 HP at the wheels. At full boost, the indicated fuel pressure (taken off
the service fitting on the fuel filter) jumps up to 95-100 PSI, then comes down slowly as
RPMs build to around 75 PSI or so. A 10-12 PSI drop is normal. From discussions with Shad,
it appears that the most likely culprit is that my in-tank fuel pump is on the weak side,
and not up to snuff for the task - he has had to replace a few in-tank pumps on SC cars in
the past.
|