The Tire Review section contains info on specific tires

What Are The OEM Tire Specs?

[KS, DB, RW, HS, FG, AT, GM, A/H]

Most cars came with Yokohama A-022H tires (A-022H1 for '91-'93 and A-022H0 for '94+). Some cars came with Bridgestone RE010.  Both of these tire models were developed specifically for the NSX.

OEM tires work with the NSX suspension to promote scuffing of the contact patch even when the car is traveling straight. The rears toe in and the fronts toe out slightly, poising the car for instant response and direct steering feel.

Combined with directional tread patterns this results in 4 different part numbers for the tires located at the 4 corners of the car. As far as I know, no other car is so equipped.

What Makes OEM Tires Different?

[GM] Only OEM Bridgestone RE010, Yokohoma A022H and Dunlop SP8050 are constructed with the internal plys angled to scuff sideways (ply steer) when the car is driving in a straight line. This helps give the car its precise turn-in characteristics. Other tires may have other qualities, but I would not describe them as almost identical to OEM tires.

[KS] There are three tires that are made specifically for the NSX: Yokohama A-022H, Bridgestone RE010, and Dunlop SP8050. All three are designed to  maximize the handling and precise turn-in of the car. All three wear fairly quickly, have outstanding dry traction, and not very good wet traction. Numerous list members have reported that the Yokohama's have the best handling and traction of these three tires.

Other tires will not have the precise feel on turn-in that these three tires do. However, all other factors depend on the tire. For example, as a general rule, track tires (like the Goodrich R1 or Yokohama A032R) will actually have LESS tread life than the NSX-specific tires, and better dry traction (quicker lap times). OTOH, some list members have switched to
non-NSX-specific street tires, particularly the Dunlop SP8000, because they want longer tread life and better wet traction than those, and are willing to sacrifice dry performance and handling. Note that Dunlop has a new line, the SP9000, which will eventually replace the SP8000 and is reported to have even better tread life and wet and dry traction than the SP8000.

[Michael F. Hollander, Yokohama Tire Specialist] Here's some additional information from our Technical Department:

The compound of the front and rear NSX tires are slightly different in grip level. In addition to the compound, there are numerous construction and tread profile differences between the tires. These differences are necessary to work with the design of the suspension to give the target handling requested by the vehicle maker.

UTQG tradwear ratings are based on a tires wear performance against a standard monitoring tire chosen by the US Government. The manufacturer chooses the exact rating to use based on testing data received for the compound used. Although the grip level of the compounds used for the front and rear of the NSX is different, the result of the test against the course monitoring tire were relatively close. As the ratings used by manufacturers is normally conservative, the tires could be rated the same to avoid confusion for the uninformed customer.

Compounds can be made today to have different grip levels but be relatively close in wear characteristics. Although the grip level of the front and rear tires is different, ti is not a large change from one to the other. The request from Acura was to help stabilize the car during high speed cornering and assist with the development of a slight understeer condition. To accomplish this, the rear tires are constructed to add a "toe in" effect in the rear as well as generate more grip in the rear than in the front to give "understeer". The compound grip change to make this happen was small, resulting in relatively close UTQG ratings.

[DHW - 99/9/16] There was a change in compound of the OEM Yokohamas according to George Lugo at NSXPO'97. The compound was made a little bit harder (10%?) to address the "premature tire wear" concern that was brought out in the early years.

What Special Considerations Do OEM Tires Require?

ALL factory tires are corner-specific (meaning they cannot be rotated).  Do NOT let anyone rotate your stock tires. Also, Yokohama A022 tires for the NSX have built in bias - the fronts pull to the outside and the rears pull to the inside. Therefore if you mix a normal (RX-7) A022 with a A022H (NSX tire) you may get some handling surprises.

Factory tires for the NSX wear out quickly. There are several reasons for rapid (not necessarily excessive) tire wear. factory tires are a very soft, sticky compound. '91-'93 NSX's with Yokos driven on the street (not racetrack) typically get 5,000-8,000 miles to a set of rear A-022H tires, and usually at least double that for front tires. The '94+ models came with 16 inch front and 17 inch rear tires which last a little longer.

The front tires tend to wear out first on the inside. Turn the steering wheel all the way to one side to inspect the full width of the tread. This wear is caused by both the toe-out and negative camber of the front end. See Tires and Wheels - Alignment for more discussion of alignment.

[BZ] I just put 4 new A022s on my car. I watched the guy as he mounted the tires and caught him doing it incorrectly. I.E. he put the left tire on the wheel headed for the right side. He assumed the arrows are on the outside. He was half right. There are arrows are on *both* sides of the A022s. They are labeled "SIDE FACING OUTWARDS" and "SIDE FACING INWARDS" .

[KS] When the Yokohama A022H are new, they have a HUGE colored sticker on the tread that says (for example) RIGHT REAR. The sticker is triangle shaped with an arrow at the point of the triangle that says ROTATION.

[JS] My only experience has been with the yokos. Once wear begins to approach the wear bars, the wear rate seems to increase exponentially. You can go from the wear bars to cord in a few hundred miles. Similarly, handling becomes squirrelly and unpredictable. Tread lightly my friend!

How Can I Improve Tire Life?

[KS] Some owners are quite happy with the performance of these tires and don't mind how long they last. For those who feel otherwise, there are several ways to get longer tread life.

Alignment

[KS] One is to use the '93 and later alignment specs, which can be used on any year NSX (see Tires and Wheels - Alignment). The alignment for '91-92 was set to maximize handling and cornering capability. In later years this was changed, in part to reduce tire wear.

Tires

Another way to get longer tread life is to switch to a different model tire (see Tire Reviews). Any tire is a compromise among tread life, dry traction, wet traction, handling, price, etc. The Yokohama A-022H was designed to maximize precision in handling with outstanding performance on dry pavement, while accepting a sacrifice in tread life. Some other tires will give greater tread life and wet traction while experiencing reduced handling and dry traction.

[HM] I was told by the Yokohama guy at NSXPO 97 that the bigger tires WILL last longer. His reason: Bigger tires can handle the load better than smaller tires. My 17 rears went 12,000 miles and that included two track events. My 16" fronts have 16,500 miles on them and still look great. BTW, I even changed my aligment BACK to the original tire eating specs.

Inflation Pressure

[LE - 99/11/26] It is my experience that stock pressures (40 rear, 33 front) are too high for even tread wear on the Yoko A022H's if you don't push the car a little. If you are pushing the car the tires will wear more evenly. Obviously Honda was expecting the car to be driven hard versus logging lots of highway miles when they came up with the pressure recommendations. This is along the same lines as the the front camber angle being too aggressive and wearing the inside edge of the front tires if you are not pushing the car much.

If you drive it harder through turns on a regular basis you'll find the wear evens out. Or you can lower the pressure. I drop mine to around 30-31 front, 35-37 rear when I'm planning to do a lot of Interstate driving.

How Do The OEM Yokos and Bridgestones Compare?

I did a back to back comparison of an NSX with Bridgestones vs one with the Yokos. Both had about 50% tread left. The Yokos seem to have stiffer sidewalls and a slightly harsher ride but in return, the turn in is slightly sharper. The yokos do seem to be slightly quieter, though not by much.

The Bridgestones are more compliant in their ride and the car actually feels "softer" and more substantial as a result. Did not have an opportunity to test the yokos at the limit.

[FG] Bridgestone RE010, 12,000 miles inc. 100 track miles. Driven reasonably hard (including cloverleaf ramp laps for fun, mostly redlined 1st and 2nd gear shifts, most turns at 8/10ths) Fronts: Worn on the inside - barely visible tread blocks, outside still with about 3/16 left. Rears: even wear, 1/8" left.

[FG] OK folks, I just spent the afternoon being my own test driver and pit crew. I managed to get an extra set of 16/17 OEM wheels with Yoko A022 on them. My normal set are RE010s that came with the car. Both sets of tires have about the same wear on them - my est. 5000 miles.

Given that I do not have the capability to do instrumented testing, I can only give you my subjective ratings.

Conditions: Temp. about 78 degrees. 70% humidity, partly cloudy. Venue: some curvy roads near my house that I use everyday and some cloverleaf ramps.

First thing that I noticed after switching to the A022 was that they were noisier - particularly with the top off and windows down. With the top on and on the highway, you can tell they are noisier only if you do a back to back comparison.

The A022 was more confidence inspiring - they just provided a tad more feedback. I think their friction curve is more linear compared to the RE010 that are more progressive. However, near the limit, the A022 dropped off more rapidly though still with very good feedback. The RE010 lacks the feedback at the limit and you feel like the car could just suddenly go (not that this is the case - it just feels that way). I would say in terms of ultimate cornering grip, the RE010 is probably a tad better (contrary to popular belief, though this theory is supported by some feedback from another list member from Japan). However, I think I would feel much better driving near the limit with the A022. Just as a sidenote, the A032R on 15/16 that I use for the track isn't very confidence inspiring despite the higher adhesion limit.

Road comfort/compliance in the A022 seemed to be better - this is not to say that the A022 has a softer sidewall. It could be that the tire spring rate is better suited to the suspension on my T. From what I can remember, the A022 on a coupe with 15/16 wheels felt harsher than my setup on the T (probably due to the suspension differences).

[DG] A couple days ago I drove a '95 T with the RE010's for a list member from another state who's considering buying it. Although I didn't do as much of a "side-by-side" comparison as Francis did, I MOSTLY agree with his observations (my car has the Yokos): the Yokos feel more nimble and responsive, and a little more "abrupt" at the limit, whereas the RE010s have more progressive characteristics at the limit. I don't think the RE010s grip better, however: but I could see how it might be possible to reach that conclusion because of the more progressive approach to the limit than the Yokos.

[SW - 99/7/20] My car came with Yoko's A022's (16/17's) and this is my first experience with them. I've always run the Bridgestone RE010's and in comparison find them a little more driver friendly in overall ride and performance -maybe a better balance for everyday driving.

The Yoko's seem pretty sensitive and unforgiving-I mean every groove and rut makes the car track into them. The Bridgestones didn't seem to react so abruptly. I'm Running 33F and 38R and the higher the pressure the more sensitive they get.

What Are The OEM Tire Part Numbers/Prices?

Yokohama Part Numbers ('94-'97):  Left Front: 02210,  Right Front: 02211,   Left Rear: 02212,  Right Rear: 02213

Current prices from Tire Rack for '91-'93 stock sizes (205/50ZR-15 and 225/50ZR-16) are as follows:

What Aftermarket Sizes Should I Use?

How wide a tire can I put on X rim?

[KZ - 2000/7/6] Multiply the rim width by 25.4 and then by 1.1 and 1.3. For an eight inch rim that would give you a range of 223 - 264. BUT, you're not done yet. If the aspect ratio is on the low side (35 - 45) you will need to stay close to the bottom of the range. This will be the case with the NSX. If it's for another car with smaller rims and tires with aspect ratios of 50 - 70 you can creep up to the top of the range.

Profile

[BP] As for low profile tires. I talked in depth with several racers and they all agree that lower profile tires look cool, but handle unpredictably. At the corning limits of your car, you will "feel" the tires getting "lose" with a higher profile tire before they actually let go. The lower profile tires give little warning to a possible spin. I can attest to that!!! Also, higher profile tires flex in the turns which allows more tire patch to make contact with the road surface. This is why NASCAR, F1, IRL, etc... run high profile tires.

Here is what is available and what will fit the 17/18 wheel combo according to my tire source: 

FRONT:
STOCK: 205/50-15 = 23.0709" tall
STOCK: 215/45-16 = 23.6181" tall
ACCEPTABLE SIZES:
225/40-16 = 23.0866" tall (Dunlop SP8000's only $100 each)
215/40-17 = 23.7716" tall (Yoko AVS, about $145 each)

REAR:
STOCK: 225/50-16 = 24.8583" tall
STOCK: 245/40-17 = 24.7165" tall
ACCEPTABLE SIZES:
255/40-17 = 25.0315" tall (too many to list that are avalible)
255/35-18 = 25.0275" tall (Yoko AVS, about $300 each)

Reported Results

[DH] The widest that will fit on the front without major rubbing is 235/45-17. With the 245/45-17 fronts, the suspension needs to be raised a little.

[TS] Have Eibach springs (1.5" lower) with 225/35/17 and 285/30/18 and no rubbing at all. Rims are 8 and 10 inches wide.

The Chart!