• Protip: Profile posts are public! Use Conversations to message other members privately. Everyone can see the content of a profile post.

Midwest front plate law read this

Amen!
 
first draft -- ILLINOIS petition

here's a first-pass draft for an Illinois petition, based on the Texas one... please post suggested changes here.

To: Illinois Legislators - Springfield, Illinois

We, the Undersigned, petition the State of Illinois to revoke the current law requiring the display of a front license plate on passenger vehicles.

We support the current and future licensing fee structure, but ask that the law reflect that a front license plate is no longer required. We believe that there are significant benefits in not requiring front license plates and our reasons for this belief are briefly summarized in the paragraphs below.

First, eliminating the need for a front license plate will significantly reduce the Illinois DMV costs associated with production, storage, and shipping.

Second, a front license plate restricts the performance, and can increase the operating costs of passenger vehicles. Modern cars are no longer being designed with front license plates in mind. Installing the mounting brackets that are necessary to hold the plates interfere with the cars' aerodynamics, and degrade fuel economy; these can also impede the airflow that is critical to cooling the vehicle to maximize fuel efficiency. These often get damaged during the car-washing process and also cause a devaluation of Collectors Edition or other such Limited Edition vehicles when required to drill or otherwise modify the front bumper.

Third, unnecessary damage is sustained from minor bumper-to-bumper collisions, because the front mounting brackets on passenger cars can cause cracks and abrasions to the rear bumpers of the cars that they hit.

Finally, police officers will be more productive in stopping dangerous motor vehicle violations such as drunk driving, reckless driving, speeding, racing, etc., since their time will not be compromised by a Illinois motorist who simply did not have a front license plate on display.

Law enforcement officials might be opposed to a measure abolishing the front license plate requirement, as they might believe that losing the extra plate will make it more difficult for them to do their jobs in the best possible manner. However, in the 20 or more states that have abolished the front license plate requirement, there is no evidence of a decline in public safety as a result of the plate removal.

We the Voters and General Public of Illinois urge you, the law making officials, to remove this law from enforcement. As stated above, there are numerous benefits to no longer requiring a front plate on motor vehicles.

Lastly, We the Voters and General Public of Illinois are appreciative of the Law Enforcement Officers and Law Making Officials of this great state and will continue to support them in their endeavor to make this state an even better place to live. We hope that we can come to an agreement on this topic that will suit all parties concerned.
 
sounds good... we just need to get it uploaded so that we can start recording signatures
 
Kansas may not be as sophisticated as Illinois in some respects; however, at least we (or the lawmakers) have seen fit to make the front plate optional. The only way to even get one is with a vanity plate. SPHSTKS (sophisticated Kansas.
 
nsx1164 said:
please post suggested changes here.
.
.
.
First, eliminating the need for a front license plate will significantly reduce the Illinois DMV costs associated with production, storage, and shipping.
Illinois does not have a government entity called the "DMV" (Division of Motor Vehicles). In our state, government functions handled in other states under that name are performed by the Office of the "Secretary of State".
 
Ohio Too:

To: Ohio Legislators - Columbus, Ohio

We, the Undersigned, petition the State of Ohio to revoke the current law requiring the display of a front license plate on passenger vehicles.

We support the current and future licensing fee structure, but ask that the law reflect that a front license plate is no longer required. We believe that there are significant benefits in not requiring front license plates and our reasons for this belief are briefly summarized in the paragraphs below.

First, eliminating the need for a front license plate will significantly reduce the Ohio DMV costs associated with production, storage, and shipping.

Second, a front license plate restricts the performance, and can increase the operating costs of passenger vehicles. Modern cars are no longer being designed with front license plates in mind. Installing the mounting brackets that are necessary to hold the plates interfere with the cars' aerodynamics, and degrade fuel economy; these can also impede the airflow that is critical to cooling the vehicle to maximize fuel efficiency. These often get damaged during the car-washing process and also cause a devaluation of Collectors Edition or other such Limited Edition vehicles when required to drill or otherwise modify the front bumper.

Third, unnecessary damage is sustained from minor bumper-to-bumper collisions, because the front mounting brackets on passenger cars can cause cracks and abrasions to the rear bumpers of the cars that they hit.

Finally, police officers will be more productive in stopping dangerous motor vehicle violations such as drunk driving, reckless driving, speeding, racing, etc., since their time will not be compromised by an Ohio motorist who simply did not have a front license plate on display.

Law enforcement officials might be opposed to a measure abolishing the front license plate requirement, as they might believe that losing the extra plate will make it more difficult for them to do their jobs in the best possible manner. However, in the 20 or more states that have abolished the front license plate requirement, there is no evidence of a decline in public safety as a result of the plate removal.

We the Voters and General Public of Ohio urge you, the law making officials, to remove this law from enforcement. As stated above, there are numerous benefits to no longer requiring a front plate on motor vehicles.

Lastly, We the Voters and General Public of Ohio are appreciative of the Law Enforcement Officers and Law Making Officials of this great state and will continue to support them in their endeavor to make this state an even better place to live. We hope that we can come to an agreement on this topic that will suit all parties concerned.
 
Missouri, Missouri, we need to do it in Missouri!!!:)
 
Re: first draft -- ILLINOIS petition

nsx1164 said:
......First, eliminating the need for a front license plate will significantly reduce the Illinois DMV costs associated with production, storage, and shipping. .......

What? Are convicts getting minimum wage now?:D:D
 
ILLINOIS petition filed -- please read and sign

I'll get the link out shortly...


EDIT

Looks like petitiononline.com is currently upgrading, and is not accepting new petitions and signatures at this time.

ILLINOIS car owners -- please read and sign.

Thanks -- Manuel
 
Last edited:
9-76-160 (a) is now a $50 fine in Chicago (!)

Just got another one of these today -- now the same 9-76-160 (a) violation is a $50 fine (!).

As recent as October 2003 it was still a $25 fine. No need to ask me why I know :rolleyes:
 
Apparently the Wisconsin State Legislature is going to be considering the issue next session.

Here's hoping they do the right thing and get rid of the law. It sounds like it has been more trouble than it is worth in terms of implementation and enforcement.
 
Back
Top