A 1988 supra? That's not even a real supra. Glorified Celica more like it..
16 second turd.
my friend just got a 1988 supra and he claims to say stocked its faster than a 91' acura nsx is that true or not?? i kno this is off topic but i want to know alot of ppls opinions
A 1988 supra? That's not even a real supra. Glorified Celica more like it..
16 second turd.
Last edited by EAC; 02-06-2011 at 13:19.
96 NSX - 6 Speed - Turbocharged GT37R - 10 PSI
2007 Acura RL
2005 Honda Element
hahah the NSX beat the Ferrari 355 for that year.
watch this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU4xD7-SUa4
if a stock Celica/ uhummm.. Supra can beat a Ferrari 355
then Im mother goose
heres another one for ya. stock NSX beats a Viper
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJOXe...eature=related
heres one more
Stock NSX beats a Porsche 911
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95Bh3...eature=related
heres that same NSX beating a Turbo Supra ( I think something was wrong with the supra but still a win). LoL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYYhHdFVAAk
But some say the NSX is a glorified Civic
.
Last edited by shawn110975; 02-06-2011 at 13:33.
I hate to say it but stock for stock yes an MKIV will pull a stock NSX. I have driven both and have my comparisons. I am reffering to a 91 to 2001 NSX.
(R.I.P SENNA Len3.8, Jeff Racerxjling)
www.prideexhaust.com
http://www.nsxprime.com/photopost/sh...00&ppuser=7326
http://www.nsxprime.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124252
those pics you posted ,, WTF its my exact car. but mine is a 92 LOL the same rims color etc.
funny. but do you have a 2005 Acura TL Navi installed in a SOS pod.
I do. lol
I love black cars but keeping them clean is a BITC......H
how much did you pay for yours?
I got mine for 21K 2 years ago
Last edited by shawn110975; 02-06-2011 at 13:38.
i'm surprised that viper lost. anyway, I'd agree that a stock MKIV turbo would would beat a stock NSX, but a MK III Turbo likely wouldn't.
my buddy races my nsx and he beats g35's and 1 z06 mitsubishi lancer evos
your telling me that this 1988 supra can beat this Ferrari I dont think so.
![]()
Last edited by shawn110975; 02-06-2011 at 15:24.
Yeah a Mark 3 Supra is a real turd, and will not beat a NA1 5 speed NSX. Now if your comparing a USDM Mark IV Supra TT, then yes it is faster than any USDM NSX. The JDM Supra's are less powerful than the USDM ones so the Best Motoring Videos that you see are inaccurate of how fast they were.
A stock MK IV Supra TT can out gripe, out slalom, out brake, and out accelerate a NA2 6 speed NSX.
94 Brookland Green 5 speed
Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph.
and if an NSX can beat this Ferrari then NO a 1988 Supra can not beat a NSX.
now the next gen maybe, but the last gen I am sure the supra could dominate
I'm going to go a head and call BS on this. That is not a stock NSX. It trapped 117 mph. That has some serious mods. Like super or turbocharged. Please make sure you know what you speak of before you speak.heres another one for ya. stock NSX beats a Viper
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJOXe...eature=related
A stock Viper from any year will beat an NSX from any year in a straight line, given equally skilled drivers.
I would consider it to be a driver's race with a 93+ Supra Turbo.
Those gen Supra's definitely weren't turds. This was the 1980s. There acceleration was in line with everyone else.
Last edited by Sumeronthechain; 02-06-2011 at 17:00.
I'm skeptical of BMI videos, so I would view the results with a grain of salt. The NSX is known to be quicker all around than a 348 but the 355 is a faster car. Also the modifications of the NSX trapping 117mph is unknown, but the Viper posted about what it should have.
0.02
Billy Johnson: www.BillyJohnsonRacing.com - http://user.streetfire.net/profile/BillyJohnson.htm
Driver, Roush Racing & FXMD
i just found this vid on youtube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39Ec4...eature=related
My nsx is much faster than my non turbo 2jz although i was beaten by a trailblazer in the NSX
91 RED/IVORY #1079 NA2 NSX-R SUSPENSION, 17/17 RPF1, APR GTC 300, 3 STMPO braces, RPS, DC headers, 5Zigen GN+, Prospeed RDX tune, Nitto NT05 235/275
2012 Fiesta
94 Brookland Green 5 speed
Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph.
The youtube vid. It is clear that isn't stock.my nsx or on the vids on youtube??
Ehh 2nd Gen Vipers usually run mid-low 12's driven decently. One running a 12.9 is a below average time. Although the car is tricky to get off the line so newer drivers will run these sort of times.Also the modifications of the NSX trapping 117mph is unknown, but the Viper posted about what it should have.
1995 NSX-T
The trailblazer ss had i/e and it was very cold out and i got 275īs. He beat me by a lenth + 2ft or so, aero and gearing wise a longer race would of helped in my case to
91 RED/IVORY #1079 NA2 NSX-R SUSPENSION, 17/17 RPF1, APR GTC 300, 3 STMPO braces, RPS, DC headers, 5Zigen GN+, Prospeed RDX tune, Nitto NT05 235/275
2012 Fiesta
are there any vids of an nsx racing a lambo gallardo?
tht would be a good race i think
Bookmarks