Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 32 of 32

Thread: NSX 2.0 Design Study and Comparison with First Gen and EmergE - PIC HEAVY

  1. #26
    NSXPrime Gold myw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    canada, but often worldwide.
    Posts
    2,577
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)

    Re: NSX 2.0 Design Study and Comparison with First Gen and EmergE - PIC HEAVY

    AMAZING work!

    bravo and THANK YOU!
    '/? acura nsx $-spd $~)(%?@ $(@}/ soon.
    '07 lexus rx400h cvt flint mica
    '09 lexus is250 6-spd starfire pearl

  2. #27
    Registered User ajnsx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    japan/australia
    Posts
    2,559
    Feedback Score
    0

    Re: NSX 2.0 Design Study and Comparison with First Gen and EmergE - PIC HEAVY

    great work thanks for taking the time to do it.
    "aesthetic king"

  3. #28
    Registered User wilsonp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Danville, VA, USA
    Posts
    459
    Feedback Score
    0

    Re: NSX 2.0 Design Study and Comparison with First Gen and EmergE - PIC HEAVY

    Looking at the side profiles of the NSX and N2X (great work), you can really see the body/cockpit appearance in the original. The rear of the greenhouse in the N2X blends into the body too much compared to the original in my opinion.

    In addition to lengthing the tail slightly (opposite of the Corvette ), preferably also raising the height of the spoiler to regain some wedge to the body, I think moving/changing the C-pillar to be less integrated into the fenders would help restore the cockpit appearance and bring back a more familial appearance.

    The low wedge body with the added cockpit on top (somewhat reminiscent of older racing cars) is a large part of the timeless appeal of the original NSX IMHO.
    Pete Wilson
    2009 370Z Touring+Sport Black/Persimmon Auto
    was 1991 NSX Black/Black Auto (x2)

  4. #29
    Charter Gold BD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    5,717
    Feedback Score
    21 (100%)

    Re: NSX 2.0 Design Study and Comparison with First Gen and EmergE - PIC HEAVY



    This is the picture I have been waiting for. I now understand why Honda is making the NSX shorter because of the frontal area is much shorter than the original X, which gives it a a much better aero dynamic stability at high speed.

    I'm going to assume that with a shorter tail, it also save a few lbs.
    2003 NSX -R Wannabe Berlina Black/Red Interior #126
    2008 Honda S2000 CR Berlina Black #160

  5. #30
    Charter Platinum AU_NSX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Toorak, Melbourne
    Posts
    1,880
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)

    Re: NSX 2.0 Design Study and Comparison with First Gen and EmergE - PIC HEAVY

    Quote Originally Posted by BD View Post
    ...I'm going to assume that with a shorter tail, it also save a few lbs.
    And the addition of 3 electric motors?
    1998 NSX - Stock
    1991 NSX TT - Not so stock...

  6. #31
    Registered User NSXrebel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Oxnard, CA , USA
    Posts
    2,742
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Re: NSX 2.0 Design Study and Comparison with First Gen and EmergE - PIC HEAVY

    Quote Originally Posted by AU_NSX View Post
    And the addition of 3 electric motors?
    Maybe that's why they made it shorter, to compensate for the electric motors.
    2006 Honda Ridgeline Steel Blue/Gray
    1993 NSX Blk/Blk RIP
    2006 CBR 600RR Wht

    Saepe Expertus, Semper Fidelis, Fratres Aeterni

  7. #32
    Registered User N Spec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,028
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    Re: NSX 2.0 Design Study and Comparison with First Gen and EmergE - PIC HEAVY

    Quote Originally Posted by NSXrebel View Post
    Maybe that's why they made it shorter, to compensate for the electric motors.
    IDK about that. Two of the motors will be mounted up front, so I would imagine the new NSX will be closer to 50:50 weight distribution with this new setup, but definitely still rear biased (atleast I hope so). The 3 shorter inches or short overhang is just a modern trend that pretty much every new car is doing. I hope Honda does not follow suit when the production model arises. The extra 3 inches would not add much weight, especially if it mostly hollow plastic weight. Besides, who doesn't like extra cargo space? I love how the original NSX has excellent trunk space for grocery or general shopping when I have a passenger.

    The N2X is exceptionally wider, but basically the same height as the original, so the frontal area is going to be a bit larger but with better drag coefficient I am guessing - at ~.28. They also increased wheelbase for high speed stability. I don't see how the rear end would effect aerodynamics at all besides the underbody and top spoiler or the lack of one.

    If Honda really wanted to save a little bit of weight, they should decrease overall tire diameter for the front a bit more and of course a little bit for the rear also to match the double stagger stance. Then the front fenders and hood line could be leaner and thinner like the original NSX and save some weight upfront. I doubt that they would ever even consider doing that tho, especially if they have to accommodate two electric motors for the front

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •