I believe that is the minimum legal tread depth. Any less and you can be cited for bald tires. Even at depths more than 3/32 hydroplaning can be an issue depending on speed and amount of standing water.
Hi, folks,
In general, I change the tires on my cars when the guy at the shop measures them at 3/32.
Is 3/32 a reasonable minimum tread for a street-only NSX that won't ever see snow (SF Bay Area). Or are there performance/safety issues that would set a higher threshold for this car?
Thanks! -A
Fast cars, fast lenses and fast food!
'91 NSX, '06 TSX, '06 Miata
I believe that is the minimum legal tread depth. Any less and you can be cited for bald tires. Even at depths more than 3/32 hydroplaning can be an issue depending on speed and amount of standing water.
1992 NSX 5spd/2006 Mazda5 5 spd/2008 Kawasaki Ninja 250R/1989 Yamaha TZR-250 two-stroke
California Vehicle Code states this:
Section 34500 refers to Buses, Tractors, semi trucks, trailers, etc.Originally Posted by CA VC 27465
Therefore for a Passanger car in CA, the legal limit is One thirty-second (1/32) of an inch
Last edited by Hapa88; 03-28-2012 at 14:45.
-Adrian
2008 Mazda Mazdaspeed3
1995 Acura NSX-T
The KING of cheap ass wheels and tires... (per TURBO2GO)
Thanks, Adrian,
This doesn't apply to implements of husbandry? Dang!
So, I'm summarizing your post to say it's a legal minimum of 1/32. (Section 34500 is for heavy vehicles like buses or trucks.) That little tread seems pretty bald to me.
The question, though, is what's the recommended minimum tread for a sports car like the NSX?
Last edited by Operand; 03-28-2012 at 14:52.
Fast cars, fast lenses and fast food!
'91 NSX, '06 TSX, '06 Miata
Watch this video and then decide.
Here's the full report.. if you only drive ONLY in Dry conditions, then the minimum tread depth isn't much of an issue.
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...ay.jsp?ttid=85
Last edited by Hapa88; 03-28-2012 at 14:56.
-Adrian
2008 Mazda Mazdaspeed3
1995 Acura NSX-T
The KING of cheap ass wheels and tires... (per TURBO2GO)
I had to google "Implement of Husbandry." It wasn't as naughty as I thought:
V C Section 36000 Implements of Husbandry Defined
Implements of Husbandry Defined
36000. An "implement of husbandry" is a vehicle which is used exclusively in the conduct of agricultural operations.
An implement of husbandry does not include a vehicle if its existing design is primarily for the transportation of persons or property on a highway, unless specifically designated as such by some other provision of this code.
http://dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d16/vc36000.htm
Fast cars, fast lenses and fast food!
'91 NSX, '06 TSX, '06 Miata
In most states, tires must have at least 2/32" of tread depth. Also, by federal law, all tires have treadwear indicator bars molded into the tire tread, that are flat across when the tread depth reaches 2/32".
As Hapa88 notes, the main concern with lower tread depth is traction in rain. Tire Rack testing has shown that, in rain, braking distances double at 2/32" compared with tires with full (new) tread depth, and that braking distances are 50 percent higher at 4/32" tread depth than with new tires. So if you plan on driving in rain, you may want to replace tires at 4/32" and/or before they reach 2/32".
Last edited by nsxtasy; 03-28-2012 at 18:53.
NSX. Spread the word.
Since rain happens: What I think I'm hearing is that a safer minimum tread depth is 4/32 instead of 3/32.
Fast cars, fast lenses and fast food!
'91 NSX, '06 TSX, '06 Miata
Bookmarks