My guess is that a low mileage '91 will go for as much as a mid-mileage '94.
Of course! I just assumed that the statement was based on equivalent mileage on the two model years. All other things being equal, the more mileage, the lower the market price. And it can be enough to make up for a price difference for different model years. The point I was making is simply that all other things being equal, an earlier model year won't sell for as much as a later model year.
These '91's already go for as high 40K and I've seen '94's below that or for as little as 5K more (45K). So in a few years who's to say?
No need to wait for a few years; even today, a '91 with under 10K miles will probably sell for as much as a '94 with say 70K miles.
'Ya know in the interest of just plain civility or diplomacy, you (nsxtasy) can at least admit to another person having a case.
If you're as interested in civility as I am - and I am - then perhaps you'll admit that comments like this unprovoked one of yours aren't appropriate here any more than the inappropriate comments I may have made and now regret. In most cases, we ought to be able to discuss what we mean. Sometimes we may find that we have a difference of opinion; sometimes we may find that someone got the facts wrong; and sometimes, like here, we may find that we were just making different assumptions, and there is no disagreement at all. But we can do so civilly, to be sure. I'm trying now. I would encourage everyone here to continue to maintain the civil tone that characterized these forums up until a few days ago.
[This message has been edited by nsxtasy (edited 26 April 2001).]
