95 CTSC dyno plot

Very nice #'s. My '95 CTSC (Autorotor) put down nearly identical #'s. Did you do a pre-CTSC dyno run on the same dyno to see what you gained after installing the CTSC? My car put down 260rwhp before the CTSC on the same dyno.
 
Hi boost, low boost, engine management???
Let us know
Trev
 
Ryan - I saw your numbers; yes, very similar. I did not do a n/a baseline, so I don't know the actual gain.

I'm running low boost with the stock ECU. My tuner thought the A/F was fine. I wish I had a boost plot to see if I have any belt slippage on the top end; I would suspect I have a little...

The numbers may be optimistic, that's okay by me. I was actually a little disappointed they were so high, as I know what can be obtained with high boost and tuning, and that's probably in the 380 - 390 range. It's depressing to think what it would cost for 30hp. I would have rather seen that I was only making 320, with 60 to go on high boost!

I have certainly been watching the intercooler options with interest, and dreaming about opening the motor, forged pistons, intercooled high boost etc, etc. But that's big $$$.

I have been contemplating doing the new AEM FIC with a walbro 255, 550's, meth and high boost, but that will also involve a clutch as well, so I've just been enjoying driving it for now.

My tuner has extensive experience with meth, and actually suggested trying leaving the stock ECU and just going high boost and meth. I was surprised, as he's not reckless and looking to blow the motor. Much has been said about the resultant fuel pressure that would produce using the comptech rising rate regulator, as well as the ignition timing issue with the charge cooling, as well as Shad's comments regarding his inconclusive results with water / meth in conjunction with the comptech kit.


Thanks for the input,

- Craig
 
That sounds about right actually. The autorotor SC performs more efficiently. I think the older whipple style was producing the 320 hp levels.
 
It seems that the DynoJets are always the most optimistic.


lol ya they are.

when i tune, i use my DD at the shop, when i want WOW factor numbers, i bring it to my buddies shop whos got a DJ. DJ never fails to impress.

take it to the track, get your trap speed and time and do the standard reverse HP calculations.

then your compairing apples to apples and not apples to elephants.

:smile:
 
ron,
based on your experience with those two dyno's, what are the error margins as compared to calculations based on track runs?
 
Back
Top