AndyVecsey said:.....about ten's in the qrtr mile - I would offer Armando's left (and right) testicle to have that Golf (say, did I mention I like the sport too?) as my track ride.
Andy thanks for thinking of me but you are 2 wives to late................AndyVecsey said:.....about ten's in the qrtr mile - I would offer Armando's left (and right) testicle to have that Golf (say, did I mention I like the sport too?) as my track ride.
NSX-Tuner said:Re: Could a Turbo Charged NSX make this much HP and be this Fast?
John@Microsoft said:The original inquiry was if a turbo charged NSX could make 580hp and be "this fast" which one would assume to mean turning similar lap times, Escudo Pikes Peak Style, as the golf in the linked video.
That said, the simple answer to the inquiry is yes, although clearly the author seems to equate 'fast' most directly with engine output, which obviously is not nearly as important on most road coarses as increasing the average speed around the track. You know... it's probably just easier to answer with a straight "yes". :wink:
NSX-Tuner said:No, I don't necessarily "equate 'fast' most directly with engine output". But engine output is a major factor in straight-line acceleration out of turns and down straights.![]()
brahtw8 said:...And believe me when I say I could care less about quarter mile times or traps...
sjs said:OK, I believe you, so that means you do care, right? :wink:
sjs said:But as I said, the "video" is computer graphics, so even the car shown in the few real clips isn't "that fast".
You have just begun to puff the GFCP.NetViper said:I honestly think a Turbo with 420rwhp is more than enough for most people. I know the bbsc with 400+rwhp is scary to drive.
NSX-Tuner said:580hp Golf save as..