What is the relative advantage of the Autorotor in terms of hp/tq at lower rpm's? I understand that the Autorotor does not exhibit the dropoff toward redline as does the Whipple, but does the Autorotor have a real-world advantage for daily street use? Does anyone have a relative comparison of the two throughout the rev-range(base kits without aftermarket tweaking/engine management)? Thanks.
CTSC Autorotor vs. Whipple
- Thread starter jcjcf1
- Start date
According to CT, the new Autorotor at standard boost puts out just as much HP as the old high boost system.
According to Comptech, the Autorotor will produce 10~15% more hp than the Whipple unit. Require less hp to drive the supercharger, less parasitic loss.jcjcf1 said:
Here is a comparison of Autorotor and Lysholm / Whipple supercharger
http://www.kennebell.net/techinfo/ford-techinfo/AUTOROTORvsLYSHOLM.pdf
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Sticky
