Which engine oil gives best protection for a highmileage NSX

I don't want to start a fight but several Honda dealers did mention in the past that the NSX should get the special oil all high-reving Honda engines in Switzerland (S2000 and Integra) get: Motorex TypeR
...
...
...
0W/40. Motorex is a Swiss oil specialist (yes, we have one :)) and Honda Switzerland tells them what oil to brew.

I'd like to see a service bulletin or some actual official document or memo from Honda corporate that directs Honda dealerships to use a weight of oil that deviates from 30 wt.

Who knows, Motorex might be greasing the palm of the individual Honda dealers to use only that brand. And I would not be surprised if any Honda/Acura dealer has no idea what weight of oil to use for the NSX or S2000.

...Some oils used for the track can actually cause acid formation when they cool down that eats away an engine under the stop/start/sit-in-the-garage-for-a-few-weeks conditions of street driving.

We're not talking about the best oil brands or formulations for specific applications--we're talking about weight only. Same given oil brand/application, different weight.

If the owners manual said, specifically, 10W-30 should be used on the track then your point would be valid. But, fact is, it says next to nothing about prepping the vehicle for tracking.

I take that to mean that the car is already fully prepped for the track. Why would you not take it that way? And in fact, aside from brake fluid, it actually is.

Besides, if 30 wt was the ideal weight of choice for the track why would Honda communicate anything other than "use 30 wt in all conditions above 0 deg F" which is exactly what it does say?

My argument is based on engineering parameters/constraints. EVERYTHING that goes into vehicle design has +'s and -'s. Aluminum chassis? It costs much more and can't be repaired. TCS engagement? Works ok in certain circumstances but not in others. The 10W-30 oil? Is the best for normal owners in normal areas (and yes, that includes the occasional track event too). But wait, 5W-30 is best if you live in cold areas.

Now if the guys with specific NSX track/racecar/ motor rebuilding experience STILL think that 10W-30 is the best, on the track, then I would be a fool to ignore that advice. Factor X for example. But when Ken Sax stuffs his track wheels into his car and drives to a track event, and then says 10W-30 is the best oil weight on the track, I take that with a grain of salt. (No offense Ken :wink:). Particularly since we all know the NSX engine has the potential for oil problems -- on track -- with 10W-30.

Final point: 10W-30 "works" on track. But it may not be the "best" in that specific environment.

You're correct, everything is based on parameters & constraints and that's why Honda recommends 5W30 in temps below 0 deg F. The omission of any other alternate weight recommendation tells me that if Honda thought a different weight would benefit in certain situations they probably would have stated it.

Even if they didn't state it one certainly can't assume, as you are, that some higher viscosity is superior in a specific motor simply based on the fact that in general oil tends to be less viscous at higher temps. That fact alone means potentially nothing in the context of the NSX engine and it's performance characteristics given various oil's weight.

Just understand that your proposed practice of putting 40 wt oil in your NSX motor is based on nothing more than a personal theory in an area which you and I have no background in that's been generalized to fit the specific application. I find it hard to believe that someone as intelligent and informed as you would be willing to follow some practice that was supported by no data or expert opinion, wasn't actually recommended by anyone official or knowledgeable about oil or the NSX itself; a practice that directly contradicts the manufacturer's recommendation and has been specifically mentioned by at least the head engineer of Mobil 1 as a practice not to be followed!

The bottom line is do what you want to do to your engine, Ski, but there's never been anyone reputable that recommends anything other than 30 wt in any NSX motor with stock internals in any situation or environment that I have ever seen, read or heard about. And please, I'm not talking about Ken Sax--I'm talking about NSX motor builders. Why don't you ask Basch, Nick Eustace, Jon Martin, Shane or Chris if they recommend anything other than 30wt in any situation including the track?
 
Last edited:
I'd like to see a service bulletin or some actual official document or memo from Honda corporate that directs Honda dealerships to use a weight of oil that deviates from 30 wt.

Who knows, Motorex might be greasing the palm of the individual Honda dealers to use only that brand. And I would not be surprised if any Honda/Acura dealer has no idea what weight of oil to use for the NSX or S2000.



We're not talking about the best oil brands or formulations for specific applications--we're talking about weight only. Same given oil brand/application, different weight.



I take that to mean that the car is already fully prepped for the track. Why would you not take it that way? And in fact, aside from brake fluid, it actually is.

Besides, if 30 wt was the ideal weight of choice for the track why would Honda communicate anything other than "use 30 wt in all conditions above 0 deg F" which is exactly what it does say?



You're correct, everything is based on parameters & constraints and that's why Honda recommends 5W30 in temps below 0 deg F. The omission of any other alternate weight recommendation tells me that if Honda thought a different weight would benefit in certain situations they probably would have stated it.

Even if they didn't state it one certainly can't assume, as you are, that some higher viscosity is superior in a specific motor simply based on the fact that in general oil tends to be less viscous at higher temps. That fact alone means potentially nothing in the context of the NSX engine and it's performance characteristics given various oil's weight.

Just understand that your proposed practice of putting 40 wt oil in your NSX motor is based on nothing more than a personal theory in an area which you and I have no background in that's been generalized to fit the specific application. I find it hard to believe that someone as intelligent and informed as you would be willing to follow some practice that was supported by no data or expert opinion, wasn't actually recommended by anyone official or knowledgeable about oil or the NSX itself; a practice that directly contradicts the manufacturer's recommendation and has been specifically mentioned by at least the head engineer of Mobil 1 as a practice not to be followed!

The bottom line is do what you want to do to your engine, Ski, but there's never been anyone reputable that recommends anything other than 30 wt in any NSX motor with stock internals in any situation or environment that I have ever seen, read or heard about. And please, I'm not talking about Ken Sax--I'm talking about NSX motor builders. Why don't you ask Basch, Nick Eustace, Jon Martin, Shane or Chris if they recommend anything other than 30wt in any situation including the track?

Eh, just use the special Ferrari Formula LA Looks hair gel. That shit is thermally resistant to withstand hour after hour of high temperature dance clubs, can withstand countless Diet Pepsi dousings in stop & go traffic, and won't sludge like the cheap stuff.
 
I read the first page and there isn't alot of talk on the castrol European formula. Someone told me that after Mobil found out they were charging for full syn what castrol was charging for a knock off, mobil stoped using a true syn. The castrol European version i hear is the full syn, the one in the black bottle. Thats what i have been using. The Z bruned more oil when I used mobil syn.
 
Eh, just use the special Ferrari Formula LA Looks hair gel. That shit is thermally resistant to withstand hour after hour of high temperature dance clubs, can withstand countless Diet Pepsi dousings in stop & go traffic, and won't sludge like the cheap stuff.

Just finished replacing all fluids in the NSX with it...man, the car brakes like never before and the butt dyno registered at least 20 more hp. Simply...amazing.

:biggrin:
 
Who knows, Motorex might be greasing the palm of the individual Honda dealers to use only that brand. And I would not be surprised if any Honda/Acura dealer has no idea what weight of oil to use for the NSX or S2000.

Especially for you...

It's about 10 years old, I used it in my Integra.
 
Last edited:
Especially for you...

It's about 10 years old, I used it in my Integra.

Just because Honda makes a 40wt doesn't mean that's what they recommend for the Integra, NSX, S2000. Perhaps they're slapping their name on the oil in hopes that it's used in any car with a 40wt application. Big companies put their name on lots of stuff for general use. Hell, I saw HKS spring water the other day (no joke).

I'd just like to see some official recommendation or expert opinion that says 40wt is appropriate for the NSX at any time. I've never seen one. You say Swiss dealers are putting it in NSXs but based on what specific directive? And from whom?

Listen, I track my car quite a bit as well. If Jon Martin or Nick Eustace tells me I should run 40 wt at the track I'm going to do it. If Honda released a TSB or memo telling dealers to put in 40wt for NSXs that operate under extreme conditions I'm going to do it. If Mobil 1 tells me 40wt operates better than 30wt in certain cases such as tracked NSXs I'm going to use it. But short of any respected NSX engine expert, oil expert or Honda telling me to do it I'm not going to do it and neither should anyone else. And I have yet to see anything or anybody that knows what they're talking about state that 40wt is better than 30wt in the NSX in any application for a motor with stock internals.
 
Last edited:
Just because Honda makes a 40wt doesn't mean that's what they recommend for the Integra, NSX, S2000. Perhaps they're slapping their name on the oil in hopes that it's used in any car with a 40wt application.

:rolleyes:
You still don't want to believe me, right? :D Look, this IS the stuff, Honda recommends/fills into Integras, S2000s and NSXs. This has been with my former Integra, my former S2000 and my NSX (until I started working on it myself).

Where the h*ll are the Swiss guys (who are reading here in prime) who can confirm this? :)
 
To come back to your first question, you can't use any of the
oil you mentioned, sorry :wink:
 
:rolleyes:
You still don't want to believe me, right? :D Look, this IS the stuff, Honda recommends/fills into Integras, S2000s and NSXs. This has been with my former Integra, my former S2000 and my NSX (until I started working on it myself).

Where the h*ll are the Swiss guys (who are reading here in prime) who can confirm this? :)

Some Swiss guys shouldn't have to confirm it. Show me something from Honda that confirms it please.

You can shout it from the rooftops but if you claim Honda recommends something simply show me the directive on Honda letterhead. I don't think I am asking for too much here.
 
Honda recommends 10W30 or 5W30 and API SG or SF.

So you have to find other oils because yours are not meeting
Honda API recommendations.
 
Honda recommends 10W30 or 5W30 and API SG or SF.

SG or SF have been long, long ago...
API is the American Petrol Institute which mainly is for the gas-guzzling, high-tolerance US engines. You'd better go with ACEA B3/A3 and B4. But not B5.

Show me something from Honda that confirms it please.

If you don't mind please ask them yourself: www.honda.ch. :wink:
 
SG or SF have been long, long ago...
Honda engeneers know exactly what is best for our engines.
So follow strictly their recommendations please :wink: and
don't search excuses :biggrin:
 
SG or SF have been long, long ago...
API is the American Petrol Institute which mainly is for the gas-guzzling, high-tolerance US engines. You'd better go with ACEA B3/A3 and B4. But not B5.



If you don't mind please ask them yourself: www.honda.ch. :wink:

I don't need to ask them since they already state it clearly in the manual. :rolleyes:

When someone has something from Honda or any recognized expert stating there's something superior to 30wt for the NSX let me know.
 
i don't want to get in the middle here but you guys have to notice that the recommendations are for average driving conditions and climate. for someone driving in the desert or tundra, the viscosity requirement might be different.
 
i don't want to get in the middle here but you guys have to notice that the recommendations are for average driving conditions and climate. for someone driving in the desert or tundra, the viscosity requirement might be different.

This isn't true at all. Honda makes no distinction between average and "extreme" conditions in their oil weight recommendation.

Honda has never indicated use of anything other than 30wt in the NSX ever, period. Nor have I ever heard, seen or read any recognized expert (I would consider an oil expert/engineer, lubrication engineer, fluid dynamicist or reputable NSX engine builder) recommend deviation from 30wt in any circumstances including what might be considered "extreme."

Your statement that something other than 30wt should be used at any time in the NSX is completely unfounded and based only in the general theory that oil decreases in viscosity when hot which doesn't necessarily mean diddly squat in relation to the NSX motor.
 
Last edited:
This isn't true at all. Honda makes no distinction between average and "extreme" conditions in their oil weight recommendation.

Honda has never indicated use of anything other than 30wt in the NSX ever, period. Nor have I ever heard, seen or read any recognized expert (I would consider an oil expert/engineer, lubrication engineer, fluid dynamicist or reputable NSX engine builder) recommend deviation from 30wt in any circumstances including what might be considered "extreme."

Your statement that something other than 30wt should be used at any time in the NSX is completely unfounded and based only in the general theory that oil decreases in viscosity when hot which doesn't necessarily mean diddly squat in relation to the NSX motor.

thank for your expert interpretation. next time i see my friend use 0weight oil in arctic-circle sweden i will call him an idiot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thank for your expert interpretation. next time i see my friend use 0weight oil in arctic-circle sweden i will call him an idiot.

It's not an interpretation--it's what it says. There's no gray area. Nobody with any credibility has ever recommended anything other than 30wt for a stock internals NSX motor.

If he has an NSX Honda recommends 30 wt for all temps including below 0 deg F. If he's using 0wt he's ignoring those recommendations and ostensibly using less effective oil.

I'm simply astounded by the amount of outsmarting the experts we have in this thread. People with no technical background putting whatever they want in their motors and flat-out ignoring published manufacturer recommendations.

I have no technical background and am no expert--that's why I listen to what Honda says which is use 30wt under all circumstances. Also, I'm not hearing any experts disagree. When you find one let me know and I'll be happy to listen and consider changing oil weights.
 
Last edited:
It's not an interpretation--it's what it says. There's no gray area. Nobody with any credibility has ever recommended anything other than 30wt for a stock internals NSX motor.

If he has an NSX Honda recommends 30 wt for all temps including below 0 deg F. If he's using 0wt he's ignoring those recommendations and ostensibly using less effective oil.

I'm simply astounded by the amount of outsmarting the experts we have in this thread. People with no technical background putting whatever they want in their motors and flat-out ignoring published manufacturer recommendations.

I have no technical background and am no expert--that's why I listen to what Honda says which is use 30wt under all circumstances. Also, I'm not hearing any experts disagree. When you find one let me know and I'll be happy to listen and consider changing oil weights.

man take it easy ,it is only oil, whether 5w-30 or 10w 30 (syn or dino ).i am sure you change it at proper intervals, it will be ok , reading your posts are like listening to my brother (has his own law firm) :biggrin:
 
man take it easy ,it is only oil, whether 5w-30 or 10w 30 (syn or dino ).i am sure you change it at proper intervals, it will be ok , reading your posts are like listening to my brother (has his own law firm) :biggrin:

This isn't about 5w30 vs 10w30. Both of those are 30wt. This is about 30wt vs. 40wt.

What makes you so sure everything will be OK? The head engineer of Mobil 1 doesn't agree. Granted, he was generalizing and not referring to the NSX specifically but right now that's the only expert with anything to say on the matter and he says don't do it as it could be harmful.

Some owners here described their practice of putting a higher than recommended weight of oil in their engine (a practice generally denounced by the oil manufacturer) and when pressed to share what data or expert suggested that this was a beneficial practice they could produce nothing yet still condoned the practice. :confused:

Personally, I want to know whether I should be putting 40wt in my NSX at the track. Surely we all want to use the best products in our cars at all times and we don't want to use inferior products. If 40wt protects my engine better than 30wt on the track I'd like to know since some here are making the claim that it does. A general theory about oil viscosity reduction when hot doesn't cut it. Then there was a claim that Honda recommended it yet no official documentation of this could be produced.

I think it's important to get the facts straight particularly about something that could potentially damage the most expensive part of your car--that's why we have a forum in the first place. When people make baseless claims let's not pile on the guy who points that out and asks for some data.
 
I have no technical background and am no expert--that's why I listen to what Honda says which is use 30wt under all circumstances.


ok, so lets end this discussion already. apparently you knew the answer before you asked the question. in my post before last i stated to always follow what the manufacturer recommends (key word) for normal conditions and never said that nsx manual states otherwise. neverless to ignore the 'hearsay' which you call the general changes of oils' physical properties under different temperatures is asanine.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd like to see a service bulletin or some actual official document or memo from Honda corporate that directs Honda dealerships to use a weight of oil that deviates from 30 wt.
Besides, if 30 wt was the ideal weight of choice for the track why would Honda communicate anything other than "use 30 wt in all conditions above 0 deg F" which is exactly what it does say?

"Tracking" just means you have arrived at a race track. It is not particularly substantive. "30 weight" likewise can have broad meaning. Yet you seem to take to a very rigid interpretation when reading, like a bible thumper that worships the speed god. :biggrin:

Let's try this another way. So by your logic, Porsche should have specified the same oil weight in their GT3 cup car owners manual, as for their GT3 road car owner manual? Correct? After-all, the road car and the race car have the same engine for all relevant purposes. Think: all those motor-sports shops must be real idiots using the mnfg. specified heavier weight Lucas 20W50 or M1 15W50, instead of going by the factory service guide recommendation for the street car. Makes you wonder about the service schedule too. Shit, what are all those motor-sports shops thinking changing the oil at an interval of every 10 hours, when they could just be doing it at 12,000+ miles like the factory service manual for the road car specifies. What a waste of money. Ignorant Morons. :rolleyes:

Here is what you clearly don't understand:

The service intervals, temps & severe stresses experienced in tracking/racing are entirely incomparable to doddling around town. Does it say anything about tracking/racing in the Acura instruction manual that came with your road NSX? NO. However, if Acura had offered a factory NSX spec cup car, I feel confident that the owners manual would not call for the same weight oil nor service schedule.



Let me be clear on this point:
  • Dealerships service road cars.
  • Motor-sports shops service race cars
Daily driving from work to the dry cleaner - Well covered by the factory manual. Tracking, Racing, Cold-starts in the Arctic circle, Amphibious Conversions, Top Gear launching the car into orbit or crossing the Sahara Desert, Randy Pobst behind the wheel etc - Not so well covered by the factory manual.

Get it? Should be pretty obvious.



Just understand that your proposed practice of putting 40 wt oil in your NSX motor is based on nothing more than a personal theory in an area which you and I have no background in that's been generalized to fit the specific application. I find it hard to believe that someone as intelligent and informed as you would be willing to follow some practice that was supported by no data or expert opinion, wasn't actually recommended by anyone official or knowledgeable about oil or the NSX itself; a practice that directly contradicts the manufacturer's recommendation and has been specifically mentioned by at least the head engineer of Mobil 1 as a practice not to be followed!

The bottom line is do what you want to do to your engine, Ski, but there's never been anyone reputable that recommends anything other than 30 wt in any NSX motor with stock internals in any situation or environment that I have ever seen, read or heard about. And please, I'm not talking about Ken Sax--I'm talking about NSX motor builders. Why don't you ask Basch, Nick Eustace, Jon Martin, Shane or Chris if they recommend anything other than 30wt in any situation including the track?

To each's own, but to be perfectly candid I am really not in anyway interested in what any of the NSX Street tuners or an M1 rep said at a club talk about oil for the track. I really couldn't even begin to imagine caring any less.

If you want to talk about motorsport credentials on a race track... then the Greg Fordahl's, Lee Stohr's, and Arnie Loynings of the world were putting winning race cars on grid at Le Mans and taking National Championships before most of those guys were even born.

Look. If I have a question about a Taitec exhaust or need to replace my cabin air-filter, then believe me, I know who to call. :cool:



Well, I've never heard any NSX engine tech or any other expert ever suggest anything other than 30wt for the NSX engine so I don't believe any NSX engine condition exceeds the ability of 30wt to protect it and 40wt clearly isn't the best for normal situations so I really would be reluctant to say anything other than 30wt was the best viscosity for the NSX engine under any circumstances.

I think the practice of using higher viscosity in the NSX engine in any capacity is pure conjecture and assumption and isn't based on any data, fact or expert opinion and the practice is at best less effective than 30 wt and at worst harmful for the $15,000 engine. Your statement about having an oil cooler is the same conjecture, speculation and theorizing that surrounds the practice. Did an NSX engine expert or oil engineer tell you that an oil cooler has an impact on whether 30wt or 40wt oil is more or less effective in the NSX under certain conditions or is it your opinion the NSX heats the oil to a higher temperature on the track than can be adequately handled by a 30 wt oil?

I think Honda is aware that oil tends to decrease in viscosity when hot and yet they still recommend 30wt and so does every NSX engine tuner, not to mention oil engineers have urged people specifically not put a higher than recommended weight of oil in at any time.

What I do know is that if it were beneficial to use anything other than 30wt someone that works on engines for NSXs that are tracked frequently would have said so and to my knowledge they have not.

Unless you have a background in lubrication engineering and/or fluid dynamics I am perplexed as to why you would be sure that 40wt oil in an NSX engine would protect better than 30 wt. Maybe the 40wt's viscosity does decrease when hotter such as at the track but there may be many other technical factors that you're not considering that make 30wt the best choice even in those scenarios. I don't know enough about the NSX engine and/or motor oil to know if that's the case but neither do you.

I am really shocked that some people here would be so willing to ignore Honda and oil engineers and believe that something is going to be beneficial to their expensive NSX motor when not only has any expert never suggested doing so nor have indicated that it was beneficial in any way but have actually denounced the practice!

The suggestion of using anything other than 30wt oil for the stock NSX engine in any circumstance is absolute speculation and is extremely irresponsible. No expert has ever recommended this and it has been suggested by experts that it could damage your engine.

My honest opinion here is that I think you should continue to do what you think is best: go by the factory manual or with whomever the popular tuners are that you trust. The truth be told, for what-ever you are doing the factory 30W oil might be just fine.

Regardless, I think you have said in so many ways that the crew chief for team NSXGMS HPDE racing has made up his mind, and at this point no one short of Soichiro Honda will likely change it. Clearly, everyone should be using the 10W30 spec with the factory oil filters and crush waters without exception before you have an aneurysm. :cool:



Personally, I want to know whether I should be putting 40wt in my NSX at the track. Surely we all want to use the best products in our cars at all times and we don't want to use inferior products. If 40wt protects my engine better than 30wt on the track I'd like to know since some here are making the claim that it does. A general theory about oil viscosity reduction when hot doesn't cut it. Then there was a claim that Honda recommended it yet no official documentation of this could be produced.
I think it's important to get the facts straight particularly about something that could potentially damage the most expensive part of your car--that's why we have a forum in the first place. When people make baseless claims let's not pile on the guy who points that out and asks for some data.

Obviously many of your references are really eluding to my comments on the recent track oil thread. If you really had a question, you could just have asked. If you want, I can have Eddie can put you in touch with his Lee and the engineers/employees of Team American Honda Research whom are racing their Showroom Stock B Civic SI's this year at SCCA National run-offs. You can ask them if they go by the factory service manual. Maybe they can explain oil tech to you. :rolleyes: :smile:
 
Back
Top