They basically railroaded this kid and pulled a fast one on the jurors. He was 17, had sex with another girl who later cried rape (could have been?), then later got a BJ from a 15yo girl, all on tape. The cops got ahold of the tape and decided they couldn't convict on the rape, so they pursed the child molestation...
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/LegalCenter/story?id=1693362&page=1
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/usreport_usa_court_sex_dc
http://abcnews.go.com/Primetime/LegalCenter/story?id=1693362&page=1
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/reuters/usreport_usa_court_sex_dc
"After the sentencing, the jury filed into the back room where they had deliberated for about five hours earlier that day. It was not until then, says Manigault, that attorney Michael Mann told them that their verdict meant a mandatory 10-year sentence for Genarlow. The room exploded. “People were screaming, crying, beating against the walls,” she recalls. “I just went limp. They had to help me to a chair.”
Manigault says she feels that prosecutors gave the jury instructions that left them no choice but to convict Genarlow on the aggravated child molestation charge. She says that she and her fellow jurors believed that their verdict had to be unanimous. She says that other options—such as a hung jury—were not thoroughly explained to them.
“It all boils down to the fact that there’s the letter of the law and there’s the spirit of the law,” says Manigault, who claims that she still struggles to make peace with her role in the case and that she could not sleep for months after the verdict. “Under the letter of the law these young men were guilty, but under the spirit of the law they were not guilty,” she says. “Because we were ignorant we sent this child to jail.”