Give your opinion and vote. These are all clean installs. No hacking of any kind.
Last edited:
Interesting poll results.
With the caveat that there are a lot of variables, the general consensus seems to be that:
1.) modest mechanical upgrades (clutch, exhaust) do not negatively impact the resale value of the car
2.) radical cosmetic changes (body kits) do
Opinions are mixed on forced induction systems. Turbocharging systems are rated less favorably than supercharging systems, probably for emission control reasons.
Personally, I don't think heavily modifying a vehicle necessarily reduces the value of the car, what it does is reduces the pool of potential buyers. A lot of people want a stock car.
i believe, in the future what will bring the most money will be the unmolested, original conditioned cars. Cars that are presented as they were originally made, stock and correct throughout, with all the documentation and history of ownership.
I expect values will really begin to grow about 2035 and will peak about 2045 - 2050.
This is certainly an example of not all collectors think alike. Taking the 60s-70s muscle car environment example, if this was 100% correct then tuners like Hurst and Yenko would be selling their Mopars and Chevys not at a premium (as they do currently) but instead cheaper then their "stock" brethren. Who's to say vendors like Comptech/CT or even SoS will not eventually gain the respect to command premiums on cars installed with their parts? They already do somewhat...I believe, in the future what will bring the most money will be the unmolested, original conditioned cars. Cars that are presented as they were originally made, stock and correct throughout, with all the documentation and history of ownership.
I expect values will really begin to grow about 2035 and will peak about 2045 - 2050.
All i'm saying is the value of most collectible cars are somewhat based on the hype and ownership desirability they had when they were new.
$0.02
This is certainly an example of not all collectors think alike. Taking the 60s-70s muscle car environment example, if this was 100% correct then tuners like Hurst and Yenko would be selling their Mopars and Chevys not at a premium (as they do currently) but instead cheaper then their "stock" brethren. Who's to say vendors like Comptech/CT or even SoS will not eventually gain the respect to command premiums on cars installed with their parts? They already do somewhat...
All i'm saying is the value of most collectible cars are somewhat based on the hype and ownership desirability they had when they were new.
$0.02
you are correct about documented yenko,shelby's.ect ect but we are talking about nsx's ,there are no comparative tuner nsx "brands" other than factory zanardis,and all the myriad of jdm models we never got. I'm sure there are a few "comptech" cars with thier whole catalogue including bodykit applyed, but I doubt they will be revered like the american muscle cars mentioned.... Hmm now if I can convince the collecter car culture of tommorow that the bumblebee edition is uber rare.......and desirable.....
Interesting poll results.
With the caveat that there are a lot of variables, the general consensus seems to be that:
1.) modest mechanical upgrades (clutch, exhaust) do not negatively impact the resale value of the car
2.) radical cosmetic changes (body kits) do
Opinions are mixed on forced induction systems. Turbocharging systems are rated less favorably than supercharging systems, probably for emission control reasons.
Personally, I don't think heavily modifying a vehicle necessarily reduces the value of the car, what it does is reduces the pool of potential buyers. A lot of people want a stock car.