My personal experience is quite the opposite. I have used the stock brake pads for the first 5,000 actual track miles on my car (eight sets of front pads, five sets of rears). I have never had any kind of failure whatsoever, other than fading the first (and, sometimes, second) session that the pads got hot - and that fading is the same as with virtually any set of good street-track pads. In fact, there's a name for it among trackers - "green pad syndrome". Beyond that, the pads have worked great, with no other fading, no problems whatsoever.
However, I have used only a couple of sets of Porterfield R4-S pads, and I had the failure described above. I should have taken a photo of the bent R4-S pads, the way they bent around the caliper. I would never, ever, ever recommend using those on the track. And given that behavior, I wouldn't use them on the street on a high-performance car like an NSX, either.
With over 12,000 actual track miles on my NSX, using 26 different sets of front pads and 15 sets of rears, of various brands, I have a lot of experience with brakes on the NSX. I have roughly the same amount of track experience with brakes on other cars. The stock NSX brake pads are very good; I've liked a few aftermarket types as well. The R4-S is the only pad that has failed for me when it has had a reasonable thickness of pad material on it. Based on that experience, the stock pads are fine; the R4-S isn't.