• Protip: Profile posts are public! Use Conversations to message other members privately. Everyone can see the content of a profile post.

Random posts moved out of "easiest way to own an nsx" thread

C

chaman

New Member
Joined
1 January 2008
Messages
5
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

Hey AutoVation......you sell pedals right? I got a set from you aprox. 5 years ago for my LS1 Trans Am......they rock!!!!

IMG_0824.jpg

IMG_0818.jpg

IMG_0808.jpg

100_1537.jpg


Anyways...keep the sacrifice going!:biggrin:
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

93094199_4c7ff2d310_o.gif
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

top-gear-dutch-druggie.gif
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

goldNSX said:
Why does this f*cking thread have 350000 hits and nsxprime is half of the time unreachable???
Sorry if this is a repost!
Click to expand...

Oh wow, I've never seen a person so full of bitterness all the time, I feel sorry for you. :frown:
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

Klayton, whatever you wrote, it's not of any relevance to me cause you're on my ignorant list anyway. :tongue: :D
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

goldNSX said:
Klayton, whatever you wrote, it's not of any relevance to me cause you're on my ignorant list anyway. :tongue: :D
Click to expand...

LOL, ignorant list, that would be a great invention. You'd definitely get the first place on it. ;)

Oh and if you meant ignore list, you couldn't have seen me quoting your post if I would be on your ignore list. Go lie to someone else.
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

0000g4y3
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

ewokpedophilefc5.gif
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

datapwnage.gif
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

l_01047521db4229eeff37911c3ce47eb9.gif
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

bcbd51ce032d64e9656e74295e0ee1d4.gif
 
Re: Regarding Nick Sitko

Michael Storac said:
Let me identify myself. My name is Michael Storac. I am the webmaster and one of the managing directors of SO Clear Media Productions, Inc., a non-profit organization located in Clackamas, Oregon. It is a site that advocates the rationalization of laws with regard to registered sex offenders. While many people would call such an organization such as ourselves as a "sex offenders' rights" organization, in reality we call to task many of unintended consequences of such laws. The example that has perpetuated itself through this forum is EXACTLY the unintended consequences that have resulted in 4 people being terrorized-not an exaggeration-in their home and neighborhood due to the zeal of several people. Let that sink in for a few moments.

Of course, I'm talking about Nick Sitko.

First, let me address his actions. They were WRONG. Period. He should have been banned immediately. In fact, if he had done the same in any of my 63 forums that I host (unrelated to SO CLEAR), he not only would have been banned, his ISP would have been notified. But that is my policy, and written in no uncertain terms in my TOS agreement.

But I'm not excusing his behavior, nor the lack of the administrators for not banning him because of said behavior. In fact, I agree to a certain amount of "forum justice" myself, including identification of his name and even of his criminal past.

Nick did make several mistakes in trying to "justify" his actions. I don't without a doubt suspect that escalation in part because he was trying to make light of his exposure. But this is where the actions and statements of some of the forum members began to diverge from the righteous, to the abusive, to the criminal. Yes, criminal.

Once Nick was outed, that should have been it. Frankly, the board should have instantly nipped the thread in the bud and permanently banned Sitko, according to TOS of your site. But they didn't.

What happened, is an escalation of exposing Sitko's past. Someone posted information from the South Carolina Megan's Law website, either here in this thread or in other similar threads, which can be prosecuted as a misdemeanor, according to the South Carolina website. Others took to creating Wikipedia pages. Still others created a fake BBC documentary. There was bragging...BRAGGING!...that over 60 other threads were celebrating the "outing" of a sex offender because he broke forum rules.

And as such is to happen, there were real world consequences.

You see, Nick Sitko has a family. He has a fiancee and two children. And the harassment was limited NOT JUST to Nick Sitko, but to the rest of his family as well. Including a 6 month baby.

I talked to his fiancee. Indeed, her name is Kim Williford. You, along with billions of other people around the world, know her address. She is fighting mad, as she should be. But it is not her I speak of now...it is her older child.

Nursing a 6 month old baby is hard enough, but trying to explain to a toddler why a bunch of people are driving by the house, yelling bad things, is a terrible burden to deal with. Having to deal with a father who is suddenly scared and sullen. Having to deal with the phone ringing with people hanging up all the time. Have any of YOU ever dealt with this type of terror? Have you?

"But he's a sex offender...he DESERVES every bit of agony, of terror that he has given his victim!"

Really. Tell that to his toddler, happy as a lark around Christmas, who is suddenly afraid and anxious, cries at all hours, and is scared. Not just scared...scared out of his WITS.

Would ANY of you want that for any of YOUR children?

Would any of you want that for ANY child, no matter who they belong to?

Big men. Drive expensive cars and are responsible for the terror of a five year old child. Hmmph.

Frankly, I don't know what Nick and Kim have in mind from a legal standpoint. They have the IMMEDIATE concern of dealing with their children, and in fact their immediate circumstances from an employment standpoint.

I will be very clear: What Nick did when this thread started was inexcusable. But NOT criminal. I want to emphasize that point.

The escalation has resulted in many crimes being committed, however. Yes, crimes. I have had a bit of experience in law myself, and several people have opined that just because they pulled the public court record from the court, not from the registry, they are well within their rights to post it on a forum. However, they fail to realize that it was the REGISTRY that triggered the action to obtain the records, and the MANNER in which the court record were disseminated was the result of an illegal posting of the registry information in the first place. Tread lightly with that argument; it's been successfully prosecuted in similar circumstances.

As I said before the sheer volume and intensity of interest has predictably triggered the harassment of Nick and Kim. The fact that people here are celebrating the fact that someone's been outed, that it has made this forum the most popular car forum in history, is frankly beyond the pale in my book. Yes, deal harshly with someone who spams you. But don't use the excuse that "Nick kept showing up and lying, again and again, so we are justified in doing what we did." Fine.

I will state this: Nick will never show his face around this forum again. I have talked to his fiancee about the inadvisability of using forum signatures for affiliate marketing; I'm sure their lawyer will advise him more succinctly. The fact that he did what he did is, again, inexcusable, but not criminally illegal. The threats his family have received IS criminally illegal. And the threats would not have occurred without the escalation that was, in fact, encouraged.

But keep in mind, the real victim of Nick's stupidity, and many members depravity: his child. For God's sake, let's cut the cord NOW, and go back to talking about cars. Leave his family alone by stopping the perpetuation of this terroristic nonsense.

I do not plan on replying within this thread, as I believe in more transparent communication. I can be reached at [email protected], and the organization is on the web at http://www.soclear.org. NOTE: This is not a promotion, but an identification of who I am, including our business address and phone number, for the purpose of transparency. I will respond to any reasonable email, no matter your position on sex offender issues and Internet law.
Click to expand...



I farted
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

Who do we feel bad for? Nick or the guy who wrecked this Enzo?

Enzo.jpg
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

DocL what car is that in the picture?
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

At first I thought it was a Ferrari but I couldnt tell for sure
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

All this talk about what a good Christain drives makes me wonder what kind of car Jamie Lynn Spears boyfiend drves. You know that guy she met at church. :biggrin: :wink:
 
Re: Easiest way to own a NSX

Save_Nick! said:
Break out your tissues, this thread has officially turned into the Dr. Phill Show.


Please tell me that's bad humor. If you think the type of car you drive has any bearing on the type of Christian you are, you just flunked Christianity-101.

Signed,
A Catholic
Click to expand...

All hail the Sausage king!
applause.gif
 

Similar threads

Big McLargeHuge
Big McLargeHuge’s 1990 JDM NSX Adventure Thread
14 15 16
Replies
388
Views
58K
Big McLargeHuge
Big McLargeHuge
stuntman
  • Sticky
How to size and select tires for PERFORMANCE - MotoIQ
Replies
2
Views
6K
Honcho
Honcho
MotorMouth93
  • Sticky
***STICKY*** - NA1 5-speed Transmission Rebuild Thread
2 3
Replies
74
Views
28K
Honcho
Honcho
Big McLargeHuge
1995 JDM NSX-T Dates of Manufacture for Importing to U.S.
Replies
14
Views
5K
Big McLargeHuge
Big McLargeHuge
GaNSX
  • Locked
1991 NSX coupe Red/Black 5-Speed 86,456 M JH4NA1153MT002766
Replies
1
Views
3K
GaNSX
GaNSX
Back
Top