We recently dyno'ed the TAITEC JGTC Exhaust to determine the actual power gains, if any. Based on feedback from customers, and our own experience, the exhaust has always had impressive perceived power along with a great sound.
The exhaust itself features a unique design of relatively narrow cross-width pipe with long-length tubing with separate canisters isolating the cylinder banks. The tuned design was developed by TAITEC in Japan for optimum low and top-end power. The exhaust is available in both parallel and center-exit designs.
The test used a 1992 NSX with 68,720 miles. The tests were completed by a local independent dyno shop that uses an advanced load-based chassis dyno. The load-based dyno (as opposed to inertia-type dynos) has the ability to introduce load based among many pre-determined factors including aerodynamic and rolling resistance. The load simulates real-world road conditions which in turn affects factors such as dynamic drivetrain loss. Due to this capability, load-based chassis dynos best measure actual power from the vehicle, and use less correction for more accurate and consistent results. These types of dynos typically measure 5-8% less peak power compared to inertia dynos such as DynoJet.
Dynos were completed back-to-back with the only change being the removal of the OEM factory exhaust and replacement of the TAITEC JGTC Exhaust.
The results were quite impressive. Through the RPM range, the exhaust increased horsepower by 10.8 RWHP and torque by 11.2 ft/lbs. The most impressive result was an almost consistent torque increase of 8-10 LB/FT through the entire powerband.
The car resulted in the following peak results:
stock configuration: 218.00 RWHP, 162.2 LB/FT
TAITEC JGTC Exhaust: 222.40 RWHP, 169.4 LB/FT
for larger: http://www.scienceofspeed.com/produ...s/NSX/TAITEC/JGTC_Parallel_Exit/JGTC_Dyno.gif
You can find out more about the exhaust here:
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/focus.asp?product=eap-113
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/focus.asp?product=eap-111
You can watch a movie of the dyno run here:
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/produ...cts/NSX/TAITEC/JGTC_Parallel_Exit/DynoRun.WMV
Regards,
-- Chris
The exhaust itself features a unique design of relatively narrow cross-width pipe with long-length tubing with separate canisters isolating the cylinder banks. The tuned design was developed by TAITEC in Japan for optimum low and top-end power. The exhaust is available in both parallel and center-exit designs.
The test used a 1992 NSX with 68,720 miles. The tests were completed by a local independent dyno shop that uses an advanced load-based chassis dyno. The load-based dyno (as opposed to inertia-type dynos) has the ability to introduce load based among many pre-determined factors including aerodynamic and rolling resistance. The load simulates real-world road conditions which in turn affects factors such as dynamic drivetrain loss. Due to this capability, load-based chassis dynos best measure actual power from the vehicle, and use less correction for more accurate and consistent results. These types of dynos typically measure 5-8% less peak power compared to inertia dynos such as DynoJet.
Dynos were completed back-to-back with the only change being the removal of the OEM factory exhaust and replacement of the TAITEC JGTC Exhaust.
The results were quite impressive. Through the RPM range, the exhaust increased horsepower by 10.8 RWHP and torque by 11.2 ft/lbs. The most impressive result was an almost consistent torque increase of 8-10 LB/FT through the entire powerband.
The car resulted in the following peak results:
stock configuration: 218.00 RWHP, 162.2 LB/FT
TAITEC JGTC Exhaust: 222.40 RWHP, 169.4 LB/FT
for larger: http://www.scienceofspeed.com/produ...s/NSX/TAITEC/JGTC_Parallel_Exit/JGTC_Dyno.gif
You can find out more about the exhaust here:
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/focus.asp?product=eap-113
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/focus.asp?product=eap-111
You can watch a movie of the dyno run here:
http://www.scienceofspeed.com/produ...cts/NSX/TAITEC/JGTC_Parallel_Exit/DynoRun.WMV
Regards,
-- Chris
Last edited: