I love you all. :smile:
Makes good senseeffer said:If I had to choose between losing the user rep system or keeping it while creating around 50% of dissatisfaction ( or only around 50% of non dissatisfaction; which doesn't necessarily mean only satisfaction but also indifference or indecision ) , I wouldn't hesitate to flush it.
IMO only with a score over than 90% shall I consider to begin to think about thinking about maybe keeping it.
When we used to live without it, remember a few years ago, there was nearly a 100% of satisfaction!
I also believe when someone has to say something that could lead to affect some other's reputation, at least he should have the courage to say it directly, not anonymously.
My 0,000000000000000000000000000002 cents.
What's in a name?
What's in a score?
We are more than that...
Peace every body.
Meeyatch1 said:If the system stays in place, we should do away with the anonymous feature. It is far too easy for people to sling shots at others when they know they are hiding behind the safety of their computer screens and anonymity. I say be accountable for your actions....if you feel strongly enough to leave feedback about someone, you should feel strong enough in your conviction to support it by placing your name on it. If you do not support it this way, then your comment is most likely lacking the backbone and integrity that we deserve here on NSX Prime.
docjohn said:Some words of advice,,,learn to not take these things personaly(as you said these folks don't know you).Do what I do, use this as a tool to learn about how strangers think and react to things.You will be surprised at what others think and how they perceive posts.So what if someone thinks you should be on your own,wuptidoo.Also look at the bright side,each of us should be getting some nice complmentary comments as well and those are sastisfying!If someone is not getting any positive feedback and is a frequent poster,,they may want to figure out why,guess what ,thier content may be frivolous and unhelpful. :smile:
I can't speak to anyone else's comments, but... Everyone's entitled to an opinion, and to state their opinion here... once. However, I don't think anyone needs to post here ten times to say which way they stand. (That's the "campaigning" that Lud and others have decried.) I think most folks understood your position after your first or second post.NetViper said:I guess I am not allowed to have an opinion???
nsxtasy said:I can't speak to anyone else's comments, but... Everyone's entitled to an opinion, and to state their opinion here... once. However, I don't think anyone needs to post here ten times to say which way they stand. (That's the "campaigning" that Lud and others have decried.) I think most folks understood your position after your first or second post.
If you review my posts in this topic - this one is my 14th - you will see that I only expressed my opinion on whether the system should stay or go in two of them (#3 and #61). The rest of my comments have been about specific aspects of the system without expressing an opinion one way or another (#43, #71, #74, #82, #93), or a joke (#21), or - most often - an objection to the "campaigning", i.e., to hearing an opinion expressed by the same person over and over and over and over and over again (#52, #78, #84, #99, #111, and this one).NetViper said:Ken, you have repeated your opinion on the system more than once in this thread. Should I give you a negative reputation mark also?
Oh come on, Dave, get real. You know as well as I do that that frown is there to express your opposition to the system.NetViper said:I didn't say a thing about the system, is said "look at the votes, the system is staying "
nsxtasy said:If you review my posts in this topic - this one is my 14th - you will see that I only expressed my opinion on whether the system should stay or go in two of them (#3 and #61). The rest of my comments have been about specific aspects of the system without expressing an opinion one way or another (#43, #71, #74, #82, #93), or a joke (#21), or - most often - an objection to the "campaigning", i.e., to hearing an opinion expressed by the same person over and over and over and over and over again (#52, #78, #84, #99, #111, and this one).
Here are the ten posts in which you have expressed your opposition to the system or to some aspect of it: #28, #39, #45, #60, #72, #80, #98, #106, #110, and #113, and here are the posts in which you have not expressed your opposition to the system: #40, #63.
That practically constitutes the definition of campaigning.
Oh come on, Dave, get real. You know as well as I do that that frown is there to express your opposition to the system.
Briank said:Someone dinged my reputation on this post
http://www.nsxprime.com/forums/showthread.php?p=378377#post378377
I don't really care but they could have at least added a comment on why they disapproved :tongue:
You can tell for yourself when someone has zero reputation power, meaning that their feedback carries no points (positive or negative). In such cases, the feedback is shown with a gray box next to it, instead of a green box (positive points) or a red box (negative points).NSX Prime said:It is not a ding - the user who left it has zero reputation power. Possibly just a new user clicking the wrong thing, who knows. That's why I set it to require 50 public posts before someone has any reputation power.