Recent content by lynn stedham

yes ,there is a performance difference..i have driven both and own an auto..part of the difference is in the horsepower you previously noted but also i believe the auto is geared differently with only 4-speed vs the 5-speed manual...i went with the auto for convenience as i drive alot of miles...

i have a 93 auto and other than some good natured ribbing from other nsx'ers have never regretted it..i commute a lot(20-25m yr) and ,gasp,use my car as a mobile office..the auto was the only choice for me..i use a mild nitrous system for the times when someone comes alongside and have no...

in the faq section on nos,someone had a post about a 100 and 150 hp nos versions(i assume wet or fogger type)that he had used on his nsx...any info on these applications?

i have a 93 auto..did acura specifically design this transmission for the nsx? it would seem unlikely given the low production volumes...if it is a "shared" tranny, then what model was it derived from? thanks