Anybody test drive or own one? Opinions?
It could be A LOT WORSE
It could be the Honda Crosstour...
AHH! MY EYES!!!
Other than the ZDX, what current Honda or Acura is good looking? I can't think of one. The Civic SI I like... CRV? eh... pilot? ugly... accord? meh... crosstour? puke. S2000 was nice its gone. NSX? gone. New TL and TSX are OK, RL is generic, MDX is Ok and I am being generous with my "OK's"... where is there one single GOOD LOOKING car? how does a company with such vast resources and designers produce a car like the one above? how is that possible? Looks like something a 4 year old drew up.
I agree with you that good looking pickings are slim at the Honda and Acura dealerships right now. Civic Si looks good. I also like the way the current Fit looks. Kind of quirky cool in its own way.Other than the ZDX, what current Honda or Acura is good looking? I can't think of one. The Civic SI I like... CRV? eh... pilot? ugly... accord? meh... crosstour? puke. S2000 was nice its gone. NSX? gone. New TL and TSX are OK, RL is generic, MDX is Ok and I am being generous with my "OK's"... where is there one single GOOD LOOKING car? how does a company with such vast resources and designers produce a car like the one above? how is that possible? Looks like something a 4 year old drew up.
Other than the ZDX, what current Honda or Acura is good looking? I can't think of one. The Civic SI I like... CRV? eh... pilot? ugly... accord? meh... crosstour? puke. S2000 was nice its gone. NSX? gone. New TL and TSX are OK, RL is generic, MDX is Ok and I am being generous with my "OK's"... where is there one single GOOD LOOKING car? how does a company with such vast resources and designers produce a car like the one above? how is that possible? Looks like something a 4 year old drew up.
Here is what Arthur St Antoine of Motortrend said about the ZDX....
http://www.acura.com/content/pdf/MotorTrend_article.pdf
autoextremist.com said:........And what about Honda? Here is a company that was founded on risk-taking and pushing the envelope by a gifted engineer who believed in the enduring strengths of solid, reliable and good performing engines. It wasn’t the Honda Quality Company, or the Honda Transportation Company, it was the Honda Motor Company, a bold, competitive enterprise that reveled in innovation and proved its competence and technical acumen on racetracks the world over.
This was the Japanese automobile company that was crawling with enthusiasts - and the absolute antithesis of what Toyota stood for - the one that marched to a different drummer and awed its competitors and buyers alike with a series of vehicles that bristled with creativity, vision and an unbridled sense of how it was supposed to be.
But that wasn’t the car company on display at Cobo Hall last week. No, the Honda I witnessed at the Detroit Auto Show was barely recognizable, a lurid mash-up of reduced expectations, abominable design, paunchy, overweight and miserable excuses for “new” (the horrendous Honda Crosstour and Acura ZDX being egregious examples No. 1 & 2), the stunningly bad (the entire Acura lineup is a living and breathing class on how not to design cars), and a flat-out blown opportunity, the frighteningly mediocre and wildly underwhelming Honda CR-Z.
What happened? How can a car company with such a glorious history and pedigree drive it off into a ditch so convincingly? How can a company that was so out front of everyone else in terms of engineering-in responsiveness and “fun-to-drive” into their vehicles end-up with a product lineup that’s so relentlessly bland and un-Honda-like that it’s just flat-out shocking?
We all saw this coming, of course. When the brilliantly balanced and exquisitely executed S2000 sports car was put out to pasture with no replacement you just knew that there was an ill-wind blowing at Honda headquarters. In the “old” days that never would have been allowed to happen, and to me it signaled a fundamental lack of understanding, or worse, a growing chorus of “it doesn’t matter” from a car company that should damn well know better.
There are some signs of life at Honda with the recent regime change, but then again they’re going to have to prove to me – and to its legions of fans out there in Consumer Land – that they not only get it, but that they’re going to get back to what they do best, and that is to build some of the best and most desirable mainstream cars available in the world.
Until that time I guess we’re stuck with exactly one vehicle from Honda – the Fit – that at least reminds us somewhat of what they’re capable of doing. Not Good...........
And here is what AutoExtremist Peter DeLorenzo had to say...
A strong opposing opinion from a journalist who isn't sucking on the automotive advertising tit...
P
Here is what Arthur St Antoine of Motortrend said about the ZDX....
http://www.acura.com/content/pdf/MotorTrend_article.pdf
When the RL was released in '05, it was top-in-class for import premium mid-sized luxury AWD six-cylinder sports-sedans market segment (ie. Audi A6 3.2 Quattro, BMW 530iX, Mercedes Benz E350 4MATIC, Volvo-whatever, Infiniti M35 AWD, Lexus GS350 AWD, etc').How does a recently updated RL make it to 7th place (out of 8) in MT's luxury sedan comparison test? 7th? for a model that is all updated?
It is the equivalent of that buddy who just wont quit wearing that Ed Hardy hat even though everyone tells him he looks like a douche bag...
Phil
A strong opposing opinion from a journalist who isn't sucking on the automotive advertising tit...