Observations of an anti-2.0 NSXer:
Why the NSX name? It is New, it may be a Sports car, but its a Concept, that's NXC last time I checked. Experimental as a tag gets applied when it actually works and you are testing it. This non-moving mockup with no interior is not a final design...I hope.
There is no single styling cue to carry the lineage I can see, so is it that its a mid-engine?
See the narrow trunk area that in no way will hold a golf bag, let alone a club. Maybe the front hood that has no body seams at all so must open to the fender lines will have room...
What's with the vertical outboard exhaust tips? Not good looking, and look at the radical pipe bends that must occur for them to get out there with the rear fender being so short.
The front is somewhat insect like, with that goofy new shield shaped smile that has seemed to find its way into everything Acura.
Side view - Mostly the look of the HSC.
Needlessly large wheels that look HEAVY - that's their idea of sports car? Maybe they are magnesium.
Hybrid with regeneration braking is HEAVY - Maybe they invented light weight batteries. Maybe not.
The doors obviously do not open, and could be OK if they were to go out and up somewhat, like the Aston Martins do.
In the original and the refresh NSXs, there were no wasted lines, extra creases or random shapes, everything had a purpose, and that cleanliness of line made for a classic shape.
lipstick+pig=Hillary Clinton. Oh, I mean This cannot be a usable design without major changes, and 3 years? Really? In three years the Ford F*ckus will be a 500hp hybrid...
So how much did Obama write the check for to get the UAW secured to build this? These daytime drunks are not concerned about quality, perfection or detail.
Sad, sad, sad.
Honda, Acura, whoever you are - change the name.
