DutchBlackNsx said:
Is it correct that the later S634 has build in M-bus support, and therefore doesn't need the cable?
It does support M-bus (that is what the switch is for in step 8 of the instructions) - it
has to as the OEM head uses the M-Bus system, unlike the newer Alpine equipment which uses Ai-Net; but you [
U]DO[/U] need the cable(s) (remember - you need
two separate adapters) to exercise using that option - the cable for M-Bus & Ai-Net are completely different.
goldNSX said:
...As I'm completly new to mp3 what would you choose: 128 or 96 rate to convert to mp3. 96 is called nearly CD-quality. In a car I'm not sure if I can hear any difference, especially with the BOSE....
(Just to be sure not to claim any credit for the installation instructions - these are not mine! Credit is due to
nsxxtreme)
I think you already understand the higher the compression (lower bit-rate) then the more original elements you lose. Of course the advantage is you can get more tracks on a single disc with the higher compression - you should still be able to get in the order of 150 tracks (depending on initial recording length) on a single disc however, even at 128, which transposes to almost 1000 in your 6-pack magazine.
I would not use anything less than 128 personally & typically use a higher rate. You may be correct in that lower compression rates beyond this level may not be discernible but I would test to find out what suits your equipment & more importantly, your own ears! If I am demo'ing my system to others I NEVER play mp3's as you just don't get the same reproduction on a good system (which I immodestly claim mine to be!)
I would recommend you try your own experiment - try several different compressions on each of a couple of tracks of varied music genre & then listen to them and see if you can tell any discernible difference. Then go with what your audible preference tells you.