-
***Text Box Error UPDATE*** Folks- we were able to fix the underlying issue with the missing text box on the forum. Everything should be back to normal. - Honcho
Watch this
- Thread starter Klayton
- Start date
Cool Vid. I like the water splashing and sound effects.
- Joined
- 23 June 2006
- Messages
- 201
That brought a little tear to my eye - wait, no it didn't.
I wouldn't mind putting Osama Bin Laden to that torture for a long time. And then two bullets to the back of his head.
I don't agree with torture if a person is merely suspected of being a terrorist. That is a massive violation of their right to trial, right to face their peers and accusers, and right to defend themself.
I absolutely agree with torture if a person is proven and known to be a person that wars against civilians (ie, a TRUE terrorist). They chose the path and now they can walk it to our tune. Have at them, I say. When? I'd say unless they're caught in the act, they still have right to a fair trial. If found guilty, I'd say do whatever we want to them. I couldn't care less. Anyone that kills civilians deserves everything they're getting.
How about they make a movie where mentally delayed kids are strapped with explosives, sent into a market, and then detonated by their handler? Or maybe they could do one where a suicide bomber prays his last prayer, then walks into a family restaurant and completely destroys it (and the civilians inside)? It would certainly balance the equation this movie is trying to develop...
That said, I know that what the USA is using on "terrorists" now will be more widely used against the general population in the near future, so perhaps I'm just shooting myself when I say all this. They've been trampling on our rights for years as it is, just not quite to the extent they're doing it to"terrorists" (or terrorist suspects).
I absolutely agree with torture if a person is proven and known to be a person that wars against civilians (ie, a TRUE terrorist). They chose the path and now they can walk it to our tune. Have at them, I say. When? I'd say unless they're caught in the act, they still have right to a fair trial. If found guilty, I'd say do whatever we want to them. I couldn't care less. Anyone that kills civilians deserves everything they're getting.
How about they make a movie where mentally delayed kids are strapped with explosives, sent into a market, and then detonated by their handler? Or maybe they could do one where a suicide bomber prays his last prayer, then walks into a family restaurant and completely destroys it (and the civilians inside)? It would certainly balance the equation this movie is trying to develop...
That said, I know that what the USA is using on "terrorists" now will be more widely used against the general population in the near future, so perhaps I'm just shooting myself when I say all this. They've been trampling on our rights for years as it is, just not quite to the extent they're doing it to"terrorists" (or terrorist suspects).
