Everyone knows Silverstone is the fastest.
When pushed off a cliff
Everyone knows Silverstone is the fastest.
Great year.
Tell you what. You are in N Ga, and I am in TN. I'll let you drive mine if we get to catch up at a regional meet. It has HIDs, Tubi and a 6 speed. You tell me if you HONESTLY prefer the halogens, stock exhaust system and 5 speed.
Hello all,
Having bought my 94 Brooklands Green NSX in May, I'm beginning to appreciate the strengths and weaknesses of the car and myself as a driver. With the exception of an installed-in-1994 Comptech Exhaust and Cold Air intake, my NSX is bone stock. The mod bug never bit me, nor will I ever mod the car.
All that being said, I had the opportunity to participate in a curvy mountain drive with a 2004 Porsche 911 C4s, a 2006 Lotus Exige, and a 8? Ferrari 328. The performance of the stock NSX was closest to the C4s, but it would absolutely walk away from me in curves while the Lotus was untouchable and out of sight (the Ferrari lagged behind somewhat, but still moved along at a nice clip). It was a great day with a bunch of bone stock cars.
I'm not criticizing those that choose to mod their NSX's, I love the fact that we can each choose what we do with our vehicles. I guess my question is this...if you want a car that can rip the track apart, why not go drop the cash for an Exige and be done with it? If you want a car which can walk off from the NSX, there are tons available, why not buy one?
Bottom line...why mod the NSX into something it wasn't engineered to be?
I love my NSX. It was the realization of a lifelong dream and I will hopefully never have to part with it. It's not as fast in curves as the Exige, or a quick on takeoff as the C4s, but it will keep them in sight and catch up if the road is right. Kudos to Honda Motor Company.
I'm not trying to start a flame war, but am curious if there are other NSX owners which feel the way I do...that Honda had it right from day one?
S
I appreciate the responses...each one is valid for his/her car and perspective. This is a tricky subject because everyone seems to have a strong opinion on it, its tough to find someone in the middle who has no preference.
The question was asked "Why not mod it"
For me (and I will recognize this as strictly my opinion) it takes away from the purest form of the vehicle as envisioned by the factory engineers.
Benelli90;89523y5 said:When I show my NSX at shows,
Is the stock NSX outclassed by many sports cars today, sure....but frankly I don't care. I'm currently in the market for a 1999 355 F1, and its already outclassed by vehicles which cost less.
I'm buying it for what it is, a stunning Italian car with a great transmission.
Again, I recognize that I'm clearly in a minority here
This is NOT intended as a flame, but are you going to replace your aftermarket exhaust and intake with OEM parts?...With the exception of an installed-in-1994 Comptech Exhaust and Cold Air intake, my NSX is bone stock.
Bottom line...why mod the NSX into something it wasn't engineered to be?
A perfectly engineered car [does not equal] A perfect car for everyone.
Why do you think they come in different colors? Everyone knows Silverstone is the fastest.
It sounds like you and NSXtacy are ones who believe that "Tires were designed for Car X and vice versa". In almost all cases, tires from a manufacturer are paired up with a specific vehicle during negotiations between the tire and auto manufacturer. Rarely are tires specifically designed for a particular car model. This is seen more on high-end supercars (and recently the E92 M3 with Michelin). I'm not 100% sure if the tires listed were designed specifically for the NSX but I would highly doubt it, unless you have any links/proof to say that the tires were indeed designed and not just paired with the NSX...I don't agree w/ your dismissal of the original OEM NSX tires.
The 15+ year old Yokohama A-022H have been the most prolific of all the OEM NSX tires over the years (ie. Bridgestone RE010 & RE040), and even trump other aftermarket offerings (ie. Bridgestone RE050 & S0-3, Michelin PS2, Goodyear F1-GSD3, and BF Goodrich T/A KD). There is absolutely no denial of that.
In all likelihood, 9-out-of-10 NSX'ers would prefer the Yoko' A-022's over the rest if they were still readily available...
*Nota Bena: purposely omitted the Dunlop SP8050
It sounds like you and NSXtacy are ones who believe that "Tires were designed for Car X and vice versa". In almost all cases, tires from a manufacturer are paired up with a specific vehicle during negotiations between the tire and auto manufacturer. Rarely are tires specifically designed for a particular car model. This is seen more on high-end supercars (and recently the E92 M3 with Michelin). I'm not 100% sure if the tires listed were designed specifically for the NSX but I would highly doubt it, unless you have any links/proof to say that the tires were indeed designed and not just paired with the NSX...
Its a given that tire technology has advanced tremendously in the past 15 years. Performance and technology standards are so much higher today than they are 15 years ago, and to deny that is to be severely narrow-minded.
Another point bringing up the stock wheels/tires were that the were:
205/55-15
225/50-16
I'll take a 235/40-17f and 275/35-18r PS2, SO3, Goodyear F1, Advan Neova over the stock dinky 15/16s anyday.
I read that on prime as well. It didnt say what credible source that came from.What about how the oem tires were designed to be biased in a way that makes the front tires pull outward and the rear tires pull inward? I would think in this case that those oem tires were designed specifically towards the nsx. Unless I'm wrong..... correct me of course.
What about how the oem tires were designed to be biased in a way that makes the front tires pull outward and the rear tires pull inward? I would think in this case that those oem tires were designed specifically towards the nsx. Unless I'm wrong..... correct me of course.
I read that on prime as well. It didnt say what credible source that came from.
I'm not sure about the front pulling outward and rear inward. A tire size is a tire size, and you don't specify when you purchase ANY tire specifically RF, LF, RR, LR when you purchase the tire, so it's hard to imagine that the tire manufacturer would design the sidwall to differ from pulling inward and outward for 2 specific tire sized used on the NSX.
Excerpts from original post...
This is NOT intended as a flame, but are you going to replace your aftermarket exhaust and intake with OEM parts?
If not, then maybe you don't want to spend the money... or, maybe you don't totally buy in to the "Engineered by Honda" concept.
No matter what the case might be for you, there are just as many reasons to mod the NSX as there are moders. Most people that I know mod their car to improve looks, performance, and/or reliability (yes, even reliability).
So, what's your reason for keeping your aftermarket parts?
.
I enjoy mine everyday thanks for givign up such a wonderful car Kenji... when you coming back to teach me how to drive her better
When pushed off a cliff
Drops like the stone it's painted to match:biggrin:
Drops like the stone it's painted to match:biggrin:
This is indeed one of those exceptions. The OEM tires for the NSX - originally the Yokohama A022H - were designed specifically for the NSX. The tires were developed and tested at the same time as the car was developed and tested, using various prototype tires at the same time as prototype cars were tested. The design features are well-described in the FAQ.It sounds like you and NSXtacy are ones who believe that "Tires were designed for Car X and vice versa". In almost all cases, tires from a manufacturer are paired up with a specific vehicle during negotiations between the tire and auto manufacturer. Rarely are tires specifically designed for a particular car model. This is seen more on high-end supercars (and recently the E92 M3 with Michelin). I'm not 100% sure if the tires listed were designed specifically for the NSX but I would highly doubt it, unless you have any links/proof to say that the tires were indeed designed and not just paired with the NSX...
Wrong.Another point bringing up the stock wheels/tires were that the were:
205/55-15
225/50-16
And your front tires will rub, at least some of the time.I'll take a 235/40-17f and 275/35-18r PS2, SO3, Goodyear F1, Advan Neova over the stock dinky 15/16s anyday.
The FAQ and Wiki is not a good primary source. Just because they were designed at the same time dosnt mean they were designed for the nsx. Show a good primary source outside prime that proves this and i'll agree.This is indeed one of those exceptions. The OEM tires for the NSX - originally the Yokohama A022H - were designed specifically for the NSX. The tires were developed and tested at the same time as the car was developed and tested, using various prototype tires at the same time as prototype cars were tested. The design features are well-described in the FAQ.
If you can show me the packet that said the tires were designed for the nsx, i'll agree. As of now, it's just speculation.At the time the car was introduced, Yokohama printed and distributed a booklet telling all about the development process.
Sorry I don't know the sidewall. Mr Fangio of the Forum. But still 205/225 is very narrow.Wrong.
They havn't on this car:And your front tires will rub, at least some of the time.
It's okay... Slow and 'stock' compared to the new "Unlimited" NSX we're working on :biggrin:dude, thats a bad ass car......
Hey, those canards on the front of the car and even that front spoiler.... If they provide any large amount of down force, wouldn't that potentially just rip off the front lower bumper?
What he means:If you can show me the packet that said the tires were designed for the nsx, i'll agree. As of now, it's just speculation.
:biggrin:I was wrong, but I refuse to admit it. Maybe if I claim "speculation" nobody will realize that I was wrong.
Oh goodie, an NSX with a big advertisement for a so-called "gentlemen's club". That's really classy...They havn't on this car: