-
Protip: Profile posts are public! Use Conversations to message other members privately. Everyone can see the content of a profile post.
Dyno rating of stock NSX?
- Thread starter happy2
- Start date
It's typically around 235 hp or so.
I bet if you put the catalytic converter back on, your dyno reading would not go down... (which means you're polluting the environment for nothing). Try it and see.
I bet if you put the catalytic converter back on, your dyno reading would not go down... (which means you're polluting the environment for nothing). Try it and see.
For what is worth, I dynoed my completely stock 91 at 241rwhp and my stock 93 at 245rwhp, both firgures from a Dynojet.
257 is a great result. Now buy some brakes! 
260.88
Highest RWHP (Stock Vehicle) at NSteXpo 2002!
'97 model -- 3.2L engine.
Highest RWHP (Stock Vehicle) at NSteXpo 2002!
'97 model -- 3.2L engine.
Several stock early model Xs (3.0s) were dynoed at NSteXpo back in June and the bone stock cars were going out at between mid 220s and low to mid 230s in RWHP. From my understanding from the dyno owner, you typically loose approximately 15-18% from the flywheel rating to the rear wheels. So, I would agree with Ken on the 235 number based on my observations.
Where did you go dyno at? how much did it cost you, if you dont mind me asking...
257 rwhp are great number though..
i am kinda curious about the rwhp number, i've been to SF/SJ NSX group dyno a few years ago, no one got above 255 rwhp.. Almost all are lower than 245 rwhp. Unless they have some kinda force induction..
-jjc.
red nsx 6spds
blk supra 6spds
257 rwhp are great number though..
i am kinda curious about the rwhp number, i've been to SF/SJ NSX group dyno a few years ago, no one got above 255 rwhp.. Almost all are lower than 245 rwhp. Unless they have some kinda force induction..
-jjc.
red nsx 6spds
blk supra 6spds
happy2 said:
Hi, i went to carbconn in kirkland, few weeks ago with the s2k club. Mine was nothing compared to those with the CT SC. I paid roughly $81. Might go there again since i forgot to take the complimentary CD. I used an HKS intake, DCsports headers, Comptech test pipes and Taitec JGTC parallel center exit exhaust, don't know if it's reasonable. 260hp for stock makes me want a 3.2l
I paid roughly $81. Might go there again since i forgot to take the complimentary CD. I used an HKS intake, DCsports headers, Comptech test pipes and Taitec JGTC parallel center exit exhaust, don't know if it's reasonable. 260hp for stock makes me want a 3.2l
Last edited:
My '92 has 103k miles and a few weeks ago it did 234hp and 186ft/lbs on a Dynojet. Only mods were a dirty air filter(since replaced) and a Dinan chip.
NSX/MR2
Suspended
It is no secret that some NSXes are stronger than others. Take my black one and red one for example: Given the same mileage, my black one can chirp the tires in first gear whenever I step on the gas abruptly, and goes sideway from a first to second shift anytime I want, as opposed to "occasionally" on the old red one.
Last edited:
That's true. Stock five-speeds have been dynoed as low as 220 rwhp and as high as 241 rwhp. Most will be somewhere around 235, and differences of more than a few hp are not very common.NSX/MR2 said:
nsxtasy said:
Is there a reason for this? Better ownership care, etc.?
AFAIK they are due to differences when the cars left the factory, not in anything done since.BladesNSX said:Is there a reason for this? Better ownership care, etc.?
nsxtasy said:
Well, I certianly hope my car was one of those "nice baches" of NSXs with that extra umph. I have not had the opportunity to dyno my NSX. I will certainly do so at my earliest convenience. But, even is she is sluggish on the dyno, She's still my baby.
Similar threads
- Locked
