Pricing doesn't seem right either. A 2005 for $58k seems a tad low to me.Odd year separation 97-99 and 00-05. Not sure how they came up with that.
I'd say that $58k for a 2005 is about as low a price as you will pay for a "top condition, average miles" (note asterisk in the article)Sure, a 2005 can go for a lot more than $58k, but GENERALLY speaking you can find a 2005 for that amount.
It is a bit deceptive to place it as their max price though as most people will get a misguided view on what they need to pull out of their wallet for a 2005.
Why don't these people just go on a forum like this and ask guys that know the car before writing an article? Their pricing is way off.
Maybe because there are service that provide prices for cars already.
It may also be because asking people who are not actually selling there car what it is worth would provide a number that is skewed higher than reality.
It may be becuase they didn't wan't to waste the time because the numbers are easily obtained from other reliable sources.
Either way, I'm just happy that Car and Driver decided to do a piece on the NSX.
Those prices seem close to reality. 1997-2001 NA2s here on NSXPrime are going for low-mid 40s. And NA1s are in the range. They may be off a but on 2002-2005s, but it seems to me like many aren't selling for as much as people are asking.
Yeah not too crazy about the title "Econoexotic"...
The number of people that buy an NSX is tiny compared to the general population and that's how I like it.