the nsxnut said:I did not cast a vote because my choice isn't available: keep it as is! I see this forum as NOT ONLY where one can discuss the NSX on track, BUT ALSO where NSX track enthusiasts can have general track talk free of the 'noise' from the Prime readers that are track inhibited! NO CHANGE, please.
Let's not have a reaction to controversy from the USGP... So what if there are several threads... that's why we use a program called a BROWSER! :wink:
As of this moment, there have been 132 views and only 17 votes. I don't think that this is an issue for most NSXPrimers. I would make a change/division when there are too many threads.
the nsxnut said:I did not cast a vote because my choice isn't available: keep it as is! I see this forum as NOT ONLY where one can discuss the NSX on track, BUT ALSO where NSX track enthusiasts can have general track talk free of the 'noise' from the Prime readers that are track inhibited! NO CHANGE, please.
the nsxnut said:Let's not have a reaction to controversy from the USGP... So what if there are several threads... that's why we use a program called a BROWSER! :wink:
We already have that spread of topics in different locations which makes it sometimes confusing.OLDE GUY said:Why have two Topics in different locations when one is working well for the few members that use this section?
Clearly, there is an established standard permitting the broad discussion of motorsports that is not NSX specific. And, the USGP definitely falls under the definition of professional racing results...Track Talk and Race Reports (4 Viewing)
All forms of racing and high-performance driving plus professional racing results.
Amen to both points - I too don't like the added option 3 for this reason but it seems it has at least a lot of friends here :wink:NSX Prime said:1. I am not going to create two forums. This one barely has traffic as it is.
2. I added "no change" as a voting option, though I don't really like it because it is not consistent with the way the forum group is labeled.