Car insurance is obligatory here in Europe and it's a good thing to have. If you ever get in a crash you're not bankrupt or don't have to sue anyone's money. We also have a long-during driving school education and don't just drive around a few blocks for a license like other continents do.
Which point? After you got seriously ill you don't have any choice or is it the choice between the illness and the bullet?
Car insurance is mandatory in the inferior U.S. as well for similar reasons. It's a totally different subject. If you get a heart attack from eating too much cake sitting on your couch, that can't crash my BMW. If you get diabetes from being obese, that doesn't effect me or somehow cause me to get diabetes. As far as the driving school goes, I'm pretty sure you are not in charge of what Europe does and I'm certainly not in charge of what the U.S. does so I won't take any credit/responsibility.
The bottom line is there is a large segment of the population who are net tax receivers. Many of these people and some who do pay some taxes are a major burden on everyone else because they get free healthcare (exlcluding those who pay out of pocket obviously). The reason they do not pay is either because they don't have to or they don't have the ability to. These various propositions do NOTHING to fix that problem or the related externalities. If a private insurer can't make profit off them there is Z_E_R_O doubt the government is going to suffer catastrophic losses in attempting to do so. Given the government does not exist, the tax payers who aren't broke yet will foot the bill. The problem has been moved around and generated a lot of votes for the save the poor party, but the problem is not solved. Changing who pays the bill at dinner doesn't make it cheaper.
Last edited: