whiteNSXs said:
I used Kumho 712 before and now Nitto 555 for my daily driver NSX. The performance/grip is more than enough for any spirited driving I can do.
.
.
.
I chose those tires for their high treadwear index of around 300 and their low prices.
If I didn't care much about performance, and I cared mostly about treadwear and price, I would choose the Yokohama ES100 over the Kumho 712. The Tire Rack did a
side-by-side comparison test of these two tires, and the ES100 beat the 712 in 23 out of 23 characteristics. And the ES100 lasts a long, long time.
Current Tire Rack prices for 215/40-17, 265/35-18, and 255/35-18:
Kumho 712: $88, $152, $164
Yokohama ES100: $102, $185, $179
However, if you care about performance, I think the relatively small additional cost of the Goodyear F1 GS-D3 (for a set of four, it's $140 more than the ES100 or $210 more than the 712, using the 255 rear size), is well worth it.
whiteNSXs said:
I don't have Ken's driving skill so maximum performance is not necessary for me.
This statement is based on a totally invalid and false assumption - that I recommend specific tires to someone because they meet
my personal preferences. In fact, I resent that this assumption is being made.
The fact is, I recommend tires because they meet the preferences stated by the person asking. And if you read his inquiry, dfaul did not say that he's looking primarily for "cheap, long-lasting tires". If he had, I would have suggested the ES100 (which is what I have suggested in the past for those who care more about price than performance).