• Protip: Profile posts are public! Use Conversations to message other members privately. Everyone can see the content of a profile post.

3.2 Valves in 3.0

Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
6 September 2004
Messages
1,334
Location
Arundel, QLD, Australia
Has anyone fitted the 3.2ltr Inlet Valves into an OEM 3.0?

Just wondering if there's any issues with the OEM 3ltr piston valve relief & the larger 3.2ltr inlet valves.

Thanks
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
17 January 2007
Messages
998
Location
Adelaide, South Australia
Not many responses, but interesting idea. I guess you're just looking to increase intake air flow rate, then re-tune for more power
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
3 July 2003
Messages
922
Location
Hawaii
My engine builder put the 3.2 intake valves in my 3.0 heads to go with the 93mm (3.2 liter) pistons and sleeves.
He thought that the larger intake valves help the performance.
My engine dynoed at 275 whp at no boost, and 505 whp with 7 pounds of boost.
 
Last edited:
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
26 February 2007
Messages
10,181
Location
37°22′17″N 122°8′15″W
Ok, Thanks. that's the info I'm after.

Bore will be slightly larger at 90.5 but probably best to leave the intake valves OEM size.

Consider a 3 angle valve job. That will increase power throught ur power band.

My engine builder put the 3.2 intake valves in my 3.0 heads to go with the 93mm (3.2 liter) pistons and sleeves.
He thought that the larger intake valves help the performance.
My engine dynoed at 275 whp at no boost, and 505 whp with 7 pounds of boost.

Yep.

If I did the wider darton sleeves I certainly would have gone with the upgraded valves.
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
25 April 2005
Messages
3,060
Location
Western PA
If you have a 90.5mm bore, upgrading to 1mm diameter larger valves only places the valve 0.25mm closer to the cylinder wall.
I don't think that's a huge difference IMO.

Since my C30 valves were fine, I just reused them to save money without spending money on the larger ones. Plus, this will be boosted, so I'm not looking for that extra few HP in headwork in exchange for high cost when I can just increase boost to compensate.

Dave
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
13 September 2001
Messages
323
Location
Lake Mathews (Corona), Ca
You'd probably loose as much flow due to overshrouding as you'd gain from the larger window area. I've never seen any data that would suggest the stock heads were valve limited (vs port limited) anyway.
 
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Joined
3 July 2003
Messages
922
Location
Hawaii
You'd probably loose as much flow due to overshrouding as you'd gain from the larger window area. I've never seen any data that would suggest the stock heads were valve limited (vs port limited) anyway.

Mark, I enjoy reading your detailed and technical posts on Prime. Do you think that the larger 93mm bores with ported and polished intake runners would benefit from larger intake valves?

I modified and opened up my intake manifold and my engine builder seemed to think that the larger intake valves would help. I didn't do a back to back comparison and I made other modifications at the same time so I can't tell what the effect of the larger intake valves is.

Here are a couple of photos of my modified intake manifold and a head modified for the larger intake valves.

CIMG5339.JPG


IMG_4571.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Top