A fellow NSX member that works at Acura in another state was discussing Acura eVRM data (print-out of Acura's full service history). He was kind enough to pull a report on my NSX when I asked. I've had the car for about 3 months and have put 1,638 trouble free miles on it but I saw something on the report concerning after connecting dots between Carfax and eVRM.
The prior owner bought the car from a Chevrolet dealer. One month after purchase (382 miles from sale to service date), he brought it in to an Acura dealer in AZ. Customer notes say: "C/S: Client states vehicle has a OIL warning stays on. Just purchased and oil was changed. Concerned was not drained properly and needs oil changed to correct". Dealer notes: "Found oil over filled. Recommend oil and filter change". It's not clear if he had oil changed after purchasing or if he was referring to dealer that sold it. While the car was in for service at Acura dealer, owner requested and completed full schedule B maintenance and inspection and replaced all fluids including oil, twin motor fluid etc and also replaced intake and oil filters etc. Only 11,564 miles on car at this point.
He ended up selling the car back to the Chevrolet dealer 1.5 months and 587 miles later. Guessing this spooked him? They sold it at auction where another Acura dealer in AZ bought it, then sold it to my local Acura dealer in NC. My dealer certified the car and provided certification checklist, but the car was sold without warranty "as is" since car had been in service more than 6 years (originally sold in 2016). Being an Acura with only 12k miles and clean Carfax I thought it was a safe bet.
Since I've had the car, I've put 1,638 miles on it in 3 months. It has been 2,254 miles and 10 months since it was in for service by prior owner with the oil light. I have not noticed any leaks or consumption and car drives perfect. The car has extensive service history at all Acura dealers preceding this incident, was previously sold as certified vehicle and again certified before I purchased. All regular maintenance is documented and all recalls addressed. Outside this incident, records look great. Could there be any long term damage or potential failures lurking from prior history of overfilling? If nothing has happened by now I'm thinking it's fine but just wanted to hear others thoughts. Thanks.
The prior owner bought the car from a Chevrolet dealer. One month after purchase (382 miles from sale to service date), he brought it in to an Acura dealer in AZ. Customer notes say: "C/S: Client states vehicle has a OIL warning stays on. Just purchased and oil was changed. Concerned was not drained properly and needs oil changed to correct". Dealer notes: "Found oil over filled. Recommend oil and filter change". It's not clear if he had oil changed after purchasing or if he was referring to dealer that sold it. While the car was in for service at Acura dealer, owner requested and completed full schedule B maintenance and inspection and replaced all fluids including oil, twin motor fluid etc and also replaced intake and oil filters etc. Only 11,564 miles on car at this point.
He ended up selling the car back to the Chevrolet dealer 1.5 months and 587 miles later. Guessing this spooked him? They sold it at auction where another Acura dealer in AZ bought it, then sold it to my local Acura dealer in NC. My dealer certified the car and provided certification checklist, but the car was sold without warranty "as is" since car had been in service more than 6 years (originally sold in 2016). Being an Acura with only 12k miles and clean Carfax I thought it was a safe bet.
Since I've had the car, I've put 1,638 miles on it in 3 months. It has been 2,254 miles and 10 months since it was in for service by prior owner with the oil light. I have not noticed any leaks or consumption and car drives perfect. The car has extensive service history at all Acura dealers preceding this incident, was previously sold as certified vehicle and again certified before I purchased. All regular maintenance is documented and all recalls addressed. Outside this incident, records look great. Could there be any long term damage or potential failures lurking from prior history of overfilling? If nothing has happened by now I'm thinking it's fine but just wanted to hear others thoughts. Thanks.
Last edited: