11 pages of entertainment.....wonderful
I wanted my forum to get on the list
http://www.hondacivicforum.com/m_532735/tm.htm
I wanted my forum to get on the list
http://www.hondacivicforum.com/m_532735/tm.htm
NSXPRIME used to be cool, not anymore. Too many lamers here, posting up wrong info and editing images to try to LOOK cool.
Nah, just someone within spitting distance of the courthouse where he was convicted. I'll be dropping in tomorrow to pull the entire case file.
Kevin1965 = NSX_Nick
nice try ..........but fail.
Nick these people are making you out to be something your not
This thread is nutz, I found it on cbrforum.com, and thought I share it with the non-auto world. Nice forum you guys have got, "The Power of Dreams," LOL.
Hey, neighbor! I'm just glad the scumbag moved out of the state, he probably lived down the street from me.
howdy from a fellow passat'er, I've been there since it was ClubB5.com
Nick these people are making you out to be something your not, just ignore 'em and as I said, get a lawyer:
Defamation, Libel and Slander
Generally speaking:
Defamation is the issuance of a false statement about another person, which causes that person to suffer harm.
Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation.
Libel involves the making of defamatory statements in a fixed or medium, such as a magazine or newspaper.
The typical elements of a cause of action for defamation are:
A false and defamatory statement concerning another;
The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party;
If the defamatory matter is of public concern, fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and
Damage to the plaintiff.
Within the context of defamation law, a statement is considered to have been "published" when it is made to a third party, meaning somebody other than the plaintiff in the malpractice action. The reference to "publication" refers to this communication to a third party, regardless of the means of communication, and does not mean that the defamatory statement has to be in print.
Damages in defamation actions are typically to the reputation of the plaintiff. Depending upon the laws of the jurisdiction, a plaintiff may be able to sustain a defamation action on the basis of mental anguish, even in the absence of any other claim of harm or damage.
While actions for defamation arose from common law traditions, most jurisdictions have passed statutes which modify the common law definitions of defamation, libel and slander. These statutes may change the elements of the cause of action, limit the circumstances under which an action may be filed, or modify the available defenses to an action for defamation. Some statutes even require that the defendant be given the opportunity to apologize before the plaintiff can seek non-economic damages.
That's a great summary that spells out the requirements for a prima facie case of defamation of character. Problem is, you forgot to do any analysis. The issue at hand here is whether or not the information being disseminated is in fact false, and thus harmful for the injured party. The only information being spread throughout the intarwebz are the fact that he owns a gambling site, that he spams multiple forums in furtherance of said business, and the fact that he's a convicted sex offender. None of the above pieces of information are false, and thus he does NOT have the grounds by which to pursue a cause of action for defamation.
We should however talk about misrepresentation. Seems to me that he's intentionally trying to mislead people about the potential windfalls that they can gain through his "favorite gambling site". Good luck next time!
the fact that he owns a gambling site, that he spams multiple forums in furtherance of said business, and the fact that he's a convicted sex offender. None of the above pieces of information are false
There is a fine line between protected expression and actionable Internet defamation (also known as libel or, in some instances, trade libel).
There is a fine line between protected expression and actionable Internet defamation (also known as libel or, in some instances, trade libel).