Since steveny needs something to spice up the site, I thought I'd throw out a little "scenario" that I recently went through to see what most people would have done.
Setting: A small Texas town of 34K people, working a relatively high-paying job with a company for 4.5 years, #3 engineer in the division, interesting work with good benefits. Have been promoted once, am in a very stable company, and have good prospects to move up. Have a wife and two kids at home and the wife doesn't work a paying job (by my choice) so we are a single-income faimly. Closest relatives are 2.5 hours away by car, then another 10 hours by car to the next closest. No grandparents closer than 1500 miles. Cheap housing, well-established schools, and lots of potential "fun" due to racetracks, warm weather (in colder months)
The Problem: Family is too far away. We only see my parents (living in Canada) once a year, if we're lucky, and my wife sees her parents maybe three times a year (they live in California). My kids don't know their cousins or grandparents or aunts/uncles very well at all. Even visiting my sister and her family happens just three or four times a year.
The Proposed Solution: Move to Canada and start up with a new company. One particular company is very interested in me but has not yet committed. Pay would be roughly equal from a standard of living perspective, perhaps slightly less given the higher cost of living in Canada.
The Twist: A week prior to my final interview with the new company, my company offers me the Chief Engineer position for a recent acquisition in Houston. Pay jumps considerably, benefits and bonuses accordingly, and I become the youngest Chief Engineer in company history with a fast-track to senior executive management (I'd be working daily with VPs and the CEO). However, I am then farther from family and church (two major parts of my life), will be working longer hours, and have to make a two-year commitment to the job. I have to give an answer within two days.
Keep in mind, I do not even have an offer from the other company at this point, much less any idea of whether they'll cover relocation costs, incurred additional moving expenses, etc, etc...
What do you do? Do you take the Chief Engineer position with the higher salary and career opportunities and suck up the "no family" aspect for two years (at a minimum)? Or do you turn it down and hope to get an offer where you ultimately want to live?
Once a bunch of people vote, I'll tell you what path I chose and why I chose it. This is not an advice thread (I made my decision already and have committed to the path I'm on) but rather one to see what kind of decision most in here would make.
Setting: A small Texas town of 34K people, working a relatively high-paying job with a company for 4.5 years, #3 engineer in the division, interesting work with good benefits. Have been promoted once, am in a very stable company, and have good prospects to move up. Have a wife and two kids at home and the wife doesn't work a paying job (by my choice) so we are a single-income faimly. Closest relatives are 2.5 hours away by car, then another 10 hours by car to the next closest. No grandparents closer than 1500 miles. Cheap housing, well-established schools, and lots of potential "fun" due to racetracks, warm weather (in colder months)
The Problem: Family is too far away. We only see my parents (living in Canada) once a year, if we're lucky, and my wife sees her parents maybe three times a year (they live in California). My kids don't know their cousins or grandparents or aunts/uncles very well at all. Even visiting my sister and her family happens just three or four times a year.
The Proposed Solution: Move to Canada and start up with a new company. One particular company is very interested in me but has not yet committed. Pay would be roughly equal from a standard of living perspective, perhaps slightly less given the higher cost of living in Canada.
The Twist: A week prior to my final interview with the new company, my company offers me the Chief Engineer position for a recent acquisition in Houston. Pay jumps considerably, benefits and bonuses accordingly, and I become the youngest Chief Engineer in company history with a fast-track to senior executive management (I'd be working daily with VPs and the CEO). However, I am then farther from family and church (two major parts of my life), will be working longer hours, and have to make a two-year commitment to the job. I have to give an answer within two days.
Keep in mind, I do not even have an offer from the other company at this point, much less any idea of whether they'll cover relocation costs, incurred additional moving expenses, etc, etc...
What do you do? Do you take the Chief Engineer position with the higher salary and career opportunities and suck up the "no family" aspect for two years (at a minimum)? Or do you turn it down and hope to get an offer where you ultimately want to live?
Once a bunch of people vote, I'll tell you what path I chose and why I chose it. This is not an advice thread (I made my decision already and have committed to the path I'm on) but rather one to see what kind of decision most in here would make.