you are missing the point-
obviously majority of real enthusiasts would take pride in achievements based on THEIR merit, not just yet another 'great equilizer' that does thinking for them. for me it is more important how i control the car (even if i make a mistake to learn from it), not how fast the car allows me to drive because with with all the fancy 4wd, traction control, yaw control, sphincter control etc., you will not even know you made a mistake and never learn. as a matter of fact, the harder the car it is to drive, the more i enjoy it. thats why cars like gtr will have following with the masses but never make it with the real drivers.
the attitude you are portraying is currently killing the scca and vintage racing where cubic dollars replace skill. no thanks.
I understand exactly what you're talking about. My MY00 S2000 was an extremely difficult car to drive and it did make me a better driver. However, my second S2000, a MY04, which had a softer suspension and was more forgiving was still my favorite. It still had no TC and was not the easiest car to drive, but the bump steer was gone and so was the crazy rear end.
The love for the inadequatecies of a car are developed over time and are recognized by their owners, but as time progresses, their "problems" are usually corrected. I don't see anything wrong with that. If there is a better way to build it, make it more stable, make it faster, etc then I'm going to happily embrace it.
I don't see these improvments as any different than us doing after market improvements. We put on SC's, change suspensions, get better tires, fly wheels, exhausts, etc. Do people do these things to make the car more difficult to drive? Of course not, it's to improve on the car's short comings. So why when the manufacturer does it, it's always all wrong?
I remember reading a quote in NASCAR that said, "If you ain't cheatin', you ain't tryin'". Nobody wants to have the lesser of anything. And if we are truly measuring anyone's skill, it is impossible to measure it by having too many variables ,ie different cars.
If you truly want to test your skills against another individual, you have to get on a track with the same exact car and run. No two cars are identical and each one has their advatages and disadvantages. So like you said, you are worried about the drivers' skills, not the cars. It doesn't matter what car you drive, as long as that variable is constant. Otherwise your test of skill will fail. You will always us the car you were in as an excuse. So if you're driving a GT-R and you're testing yourself, you have to use only your GT-R times. If you're driving a Civic, then you have to compare yourself against yourself in only the Civic. So there is still room to measure your skill.... it's just that driving the GT-R will probably be a bit more exciting.