ill sell ya mine
its making the most on here, from a pt67
Is it ball bearing? Shoot me a pm.
-
Protip: Profile posts are public! Use Conversations to message other members privately. Everyone can see the content of a profile post.
POST ONLY if your turbo.....
- Thread starter adrenaline_nsx
- Start date
Is it ball bearing? Shoot me a pm.
warren, i dont see a 62 making more than a 67.........
are you sure thats what you meant?
I stumbled across this video of a evo9 with a 67 w/25psi doing 660, they swapped the turbo out and ran a 62/62 w/25psi doing 730. I'll try to find the video.
I stumbled across this video of a evo9 with a 67 w/25psi doing 660, they swapped the turbo out and ran a 62/62 w/25psi doing 730. I'll try to find the video.
actually i was waaaaaaaaaaaay off, but here is the video
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CIheuXYY-pY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CIheuXYY-pY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CIheuXYY-pY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CIheuXYY-pY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
If the Internet said it... it must be true?
Both the PT62, and a PT67, use a p-trim wheel, the difference is the inducer size; how can a turbo with a smaller diameter inducer, from the same family, be more capable than a turbo with a larger inducer?
The situation in the video you posted seems to infer the car was tested with the PT67, then it was swapped for a PT62, received considerable additional tuning, then made the same power as before, but had quicker spool times, due to the smaller turbo. If he added in a bunch of timing to make up for the smaller turbo, it doesn't make the smaller turbo more capable, perhaps just a better fit for his evo.
Both the PT62, and a PT67, use a p-trim wheel, the difference is the inducer size; how can a turbo with a smaller diameter inducer, from the same family, be more capable than a turbo with a larger inducer?
The situation in the video you posted seems to infer the car was tested with the PT67, then it was swapped for a PT62, received considerable additional tuning, then made the same power as before, but had quicker spool times, due to the smaller turbo. If he added in a bunch of timing to make up for the smaller turbo, it doesn't make the smaller turbo more capable, perhaps just a better fit for his evo.
I don't know what i was thinking, but i should have known better. Scorp and marc are both correct and i was incorrect. I retract my statement. lol
Yes, we knew this, we were just wondering when you would.:biggrin:
instead of reinventing the wheel, here's a decent explanation...
http://www.cumminsforum.com/forum/g...isconceptions-turbocharger-inducer-sizes.html
The 6262 has already proven itself to make a bit more power AND sooner (so just as capable and faster spooling).
Capable of way over 700whp.
a pretty good choice for a very nice single kit or wicked power twin!!
Last edited:
turbo 2X.
93 Gt35r
97 TT
93 Gt35r
97 TT
instead of reinventing the wheel, here's a decent explanation...
http://www.cumminsforum.com/forum/g...isconceptions-turbocharger-inducer-sizes.html
The 6262 has already proven itself to make a bit more power AND sooner (so just as capable and faster spooling).
Capable of way over 700whp.
a pretty good choice for a very nice single kit or wicked power twin!!
The 6265 would be like a 6776 with a smaller compressor, and a 6262 is even smaller than a 6265.....
the pt67 is a 6776 (p-trim).
the only reason its making more power on the evo is displacement...FWIW, i think this is the only car that its proven to be the turbo making more power.
the evo 9 has the advantage of being able to have a nicer mani, and a take more PSI than the nsx motor....
most of the #'s seen for the 6262 are 18psi or greater.
the great thing about the pt67 is that it makes very good low boost power and spools pretty evenly. It really is a great turbo for the nsx.
the 62/62 makes that power on the EVO because the efficiency range of the turbo, its great for a modded EVO but it wouldnt do the same on a NSX. I think the PT67 does that for the NSX.
Last edited:
almost all diy are using stock aftermarket headers
Aftermarket
Aftermarket replacements for stock, that is, a header that would fit on an NA car, using the same exhaust, etc.
The power of changing the exhaust manifolds is the greater flexibility doing so gives you, with regard to turbo placement. If you create shorter exhaust manifolds, which feed into a y-pipe, you can easily create a layout that offers an efficient gravity return for your turbo's oil supply, instead of requiring the installation of a scavenger pump and secondary oil reservoir.
lol, yeah sorry I meant to type 7.8 psi. My bad.
Similar threads
- Locked
