Tire Wear Survey

Joined
4 February 2000
Messages
26,998
Location
Chicago IL
Several of us are trying to determine how the OEM rear tires wear when inflated using the manufacturer-recommended tire pressures. If you have used either the Yokohama A022H or the Bridgestone RE010 tires on your NSX, and inflated them to the recommended 33 psi front, 40 psi rear, can you please tell us how the tread on your rear tires wore:

a) fairly evenly across the tread

b) center of the tread wore faster than the edges

c) other (please explain)

TIA (thanks in advance) for your help.

My response is (a).
 
On a 2000 NSX-T(A022), wear is fairly even across the tread. This is AFTER Alignment settings were set to correct/proper tolerances.


[This message has been edited by johndoh (edited 27 February 2002).]
 
Originally posted by johndoh:
On a 2000 NSX-T(A022), wear is fairly even across the tread. This is AFTER Alignment settings were set to correct/proper tolerances.


[This message has been edited by johndoh (edited 27 February 2002).]


How many miles have you had on the tires before alignment and after alignment?
 
a) fairly evenly across the tread

However maybe just a hair more on the inside. Alignment is dead on factory specs too.

BTW I have about 12k miles on mine and haven't hit the wear bar yet. I suspect that I have at least another 2k to 3k of use. That is unless I get crazy!
rolleyes.gif
 
a) fairly evenly across the tread (A022H)

'91 alignment specs, total life 8k miles, including ~3500 miles of long highway trips (e.g. minimal cornering)
 
Originally posted by hejo:


BTW I have about 12k miles on mine and haven't hit the wear bar yet. I suspect that I have at least another 2k to 3k of use. That is unless I get crazy!
rolleyes.gif

Just to make sure, you have 12,000 miles on either the Yoko or the Bridgestone (you did not specify), with perhaps another 2,000 miles on the rears AND running 40 psi all this time?

If this is indeed the case, we have perhaps a record in the making in here .........

Note to all others:

To make this survey really meaningful as we want to pass the info to American Yokohama and presumably Bridgestone, please specify the tire in your responses, whether you maintained 40 psi during the entire time of the reported period (and for some the life iof the tire, and any other relevant information such as alignment specs outside the recommended range.
 
Sorry I looked at the wrong numbers.

I had a new set of Bridgestones Potenza RE010 245/40ZR17 put on the rear at 4200 miles and replaced them at 13,256. So I got 9,056 miles on them.

I'm now on my second set of rears since with about 20,080 miles. So that's approximately 7,000 miles. So my guess at the number of miles left actually seems to make sense.

So I'm seeing about 9k to 10k miles on the rears.
 
My answer is 'b'.

At 4,900 miles the center ribs were gone on the rears, fronts were about halfway gone. I was very good about keeping 33/40. That's w/ OEM Yoko's.

Took it real easy on the first 1k break-in miles. First 4k were around town/country, last 1k miles was road-trip. Never did a burn-out, or even turned TCS off. Other than the center being gone, the tread wear looked even, and no cupping. I'm now running 31/38, but only have 7k miles on the car. I'll have it aligned in the spring, but there is NO signs of a problem.
 
The results of this survey will be meaningless unless you also consider the type of driving being done on the tires. With the same tires at the same pressure you will see very different wear if the majority of the driving is in a straight line (i.e. Interstate cruising) vs. a lot of hard cornering (back roads or track use).

You also have no control for alignment and suspension variations which will drastically affect wear patterns.

Bad data is worse than no data.

That being said, here is my answer. It is my opinion that any answer which is less complete should be discarded for the reasons I mentioned above.

On my 1991 NSX with OEM suspension and a known-good '93-spec alignment* with A022H tires, the rears would wear fairly evenly with mostly very spirited back-road driving, but with mostly interstate driving they would would wear a strip in the middle considerably before the rest of the tire. This was with both the 16" and 17" A022H rears. Lowering the pressure to about 35PSI on the rears evened out the wear for interstate driving.

Best regards,

- Lud

* Checked alignment after going through a few sets of tires and it was still in spec

P.S. I also wonder if people's defition of "spirited" vs. "sedate" driving will be close enough to produce meaningful data even given complete answers.

P.P.S. I also wonder about calibration of tire pressure gauges and alignment racks. I have seen both be way out of calibration (more than 10%) and to be honest while I know my pressure gauge is correct because I've compared it to a calibrated unit, I have no idea about the alignment rack other than it seemed good and another one agreed with it.

P.P.P.S. All these newer owners getting well over 10k from a set of rear OEM tires with factory alignment suggest to me that something has changed with the tire compound or construction. It was completely UNHEARD OF several years ago to get that many miles out of the OEM tires with factory alignment specs.

[This message has been edited by Lud (edited 28 February 2002).]
 
(a), with a little more toward the inside. '94 with a combination of interstate and "spirited" back-road driving.

-Bob
 
On my '92, I got approximately 10,000 miles on my last set of rears. I am running the stock 17" Yokos (using 95+ wheels), and have the Comptech non-compliance rear beam and toe links.

I haven't been as good as I should be about checking tire air pressure, and I believe the rear-right tire was misaligned. When my tire went out a couple of months ago, there was practically no tread on the inside, while the outside tread still had a ways to go. I'm rather surprised that the Acura dealer didn't notice the wear or the misalignment when they serviced it a couple of months before it went out.

I'm going to a different dealer for service now, and feel much better about them.
 
The results of this survey will be meaningless unless you also consider the type of driving being done on the tires.

***************************************

Perhaps the results of this survey will be meaningless because there are multiple shades of gray. Or is it grey? Not to mention driver weight, car weight, alignment of the planets in Summer vs Winter, EOR vs WOR, color of the NSX, etc.
tongue.gif


[This message has been edited by AndyVecsey (edited 28 February 2002).]
 
I bought my stock '92 15/16 with 93,500 miles on it right after rear OEM Yokos were installed and aligned. I don't know which alignment spec was followed but here's the numbers.

LR camber = -1.41
LR toe = 0.09

RR camber = -1.25
RR toe = 0.09

Cross camber = -0.16
Total toe = 0.18
Thrust angle = 0.00

Anybody know which spec these are?

It has a Dali street sway bar added. I have been very diligent running 40 psi on rears. Mileage is a mix of highway, suburban and one track day at Pahrump.
I now have 110,100 miles, the tires are wearing evenly and wear bars are getting real close. This works out to 110,100 - 93500 = 16,600 miles. I think I can get another 2k out of these before I replace them.
 
The following results were reported in response to the same survey, which also appeared on the e-mail lists. Duplicate responses have been excluded. Within each source, responses are shown in chronological order (oldest first). Responses are unedited except for the removal of names from those sent in private. I am including all responses, even those that note using other pressures and/or other tires.

Responses appearing on the big list:

Response 1:
Francis Gan [email protected]

I've always run OEM pressures cold on the street. On the track, which makes up less than 2% mileagewise of treadlife, I am at the same operating pressures. I've had 2 sets of 16/17 RE010's and 1 set of 16/17 Yoko A022's. In all cases, the centers on the rears wore out first. On my current set of Yokos, I've had about 10% of the treadlife mileagewise on the track and the wear is a bit more. Of course, I'm also running Type S/Z suspension and alignment and the centers seem to not me worn as much compared to the sides.

Response 2:
DanO [email protected]

b) center of the tread wore faster than the edges

At 38-40psi the center of my rear tires (17" OEM) wear faster even w/ some track use.

Ken, maybe your tire gauge is off calibration? I'm serious! I have 3 expensive gauges and the variation between the three is as much as 5psi.

DanO

Response 3:
Kevin Hiroshima [[email protected]]

OK, I'll chime in on this topic. In an effot not to miss anything, my answer is "b" with the following attached comment:

On my 1991 NSX with OEM suspension and a known-good '91-spec alignment* with A022H tires, the rears would wear in the center with mostly very spirited back-road driving, and with mostly interstate driving they definately wear a strip in the middle considerably before the rest of the tire. This was with the 17" A022H rears. Lowering the pressure to about 35PSI on the rears evened out the wear for interstate driving.

ctrl c, ctrl v is the best
smile.gif


Kevin

Responses appearing on the tech list:

Response 4:
[email protected] [email protected]

I run 40 in the rear (33 in the front) and get a uniform wear pattern F+R. This includes sedate driving, spirited driving and track driving.

Andy

Responses sent in private:

Response 5:
Ken,

Response for me is (a).

Cheers,

Response 6:
Ken, the whole thing is a disservice to the NSX community. Increasing the rear tire pressure beyond 36 psi makes the NSX highly prone to over steer at high speeds.

Response 7:
I used to run 40# in the rear but was getting too much center tread wear. I am currently running 37# and it seems to be better. I am running the fronts at 33# and that seems to be correct for my style of driving.

Response 8:
I got (b) using the Yokos on a 99 with stock NSX-Z suspension settings.
Look forward to seeing the summary stats.

Response 9:
Hi Ken,
On my '92 with stock rear specs the OEM Yokos wear VERY evenly at 40lb pressure driven on the street. With '93+ rear specs they still wear VERY evenly at 40lb pressure driven on the street. They just last (alot) longer.
Also, I personally beleive Yokohama changed the rubber compound of the A022 somewhere along the way to a harder compound. Here is why: the A022s that came on the car went 6000 miles (any sane person (not me) would have replaced them at 5000 miles). I then went through 4 pairs of 245/45 A008RSs on the rear. These pairs went 9000, 8300, 9200, and 8600 miles. At 41100 miles I mounted a new rear pair of OEM A022s. This pair of rears went 13500 miles (significantly longer that the first pair of rear A022s).
The third pair of rear A022s were mounted at 54600 miles when Mark Basch convinced me to go with '93+ rear specs. This pair now has 20400 miles on them and there is plenty of tread left!
I have always used the same tires/wheels for both the street and the track. I use stock pressure on the street and drop pressures at the track when appropriate.
Hope this helps,

Response 10:
This is probably not a good data point, but when I bought my 16/17 USED Yokos on OEM wheels, the rears were very worn in the center. Pressures at the time were below 40. Can't vouch for how they were used. I now have new Yokos on the rear and am runing 37psi. Can't judge wear yet.

Response 11:
Ken,

"A"

Response 12:
I used the 15/16 OEM Yoko A022H on my care the previous set. I used about 28/32 psi and I got even wear, other than the inside edges wearing first. I had the car aligned years ago to the original factory specs (I have a '92).

My *opinion* is that there is NO WAY 40 psi rear would have *also* given me even wear in the rear.

Response 13:
Hi Ken,

I don't have those exact tires, but I've been using Bridgestone Potenza S02's and (later) S02PP's in combination street and track driving. I have been using recommended tire pressures.

I determine the wear three ways.

First, looking at the tread wear directly, it's pretty even except for the usual front inside edge wear.

Second, I used a RayTec infrared thermometer at the track and it said the temperature was within 5 degrees F of uniform across the treads.

Third, I have a little groove maker rotary cutting tool that you run across the tread and it makes a groove about 1 or 2 mm deep. Then you drive and then look at the groove depth, or measure it, to see if it's still uniform, or where it wore differently. Then you can make another groove after a change to see if it's better. I was told this is quite popular in NASCAR.

The 33/40 PSI recommended pressures work fine for my tires and my pattern of driving. The even wear shows the contact patch is averaging to be optimum for my driving. Again, excepting for the front inside edge thing, but that is a different issue.

Regards,
 
Originally posted by Lud:
The results of this survey will be meaningless unless you also consider the type of driving being done on the tires.

The contention being made by a few individuals on the tech list was that inflating the rear tires to the manufacturer-recommended pressures will always make the center of the tire wear first (regardless of driving style). Thus far, it appears that at least half of the respondents get even wear across the tread, which disproves that hypothesis. I would hardly call that meaningless.
 
Originally posted by nsxtasy:
The contention being made by a few individuals on the tech list was that inflating the rear tires to the manufacturer-recommended pressures will always make the center of the tire wear first (regardless of driving style). Thus far, it appears that at least half of the respondents get even wear across the tread, which disproves that hypothesis. I would hardly call that meaningless.

Indeed!

Had the results been skewed heavily in one direction, then the conclusions would have been much simpler. But the fact that so far half are wearing their centers "prematurely" while the other half are not is in and of itself VERY telling.

Sure there are zillion of other variables, but for the most part those are variables with random errors and would not affect the result of this particular finding (50% ...) unless those responding cause a particular error (since this is not a random survey but self reported survey ....... but we are getting too technical here). I will be happy to run a regression model if we can identify all the other variables and have everyone provide the data for each of those variables. Short of that, such information is a first step at perhaps sorting out why 50% are wearing their centers more than the other 50% .....
 
Actually, reviewing the results above, it looks like about 65 percent have even wear, and about 35 percent have the centers wear faster. (13 (a), 7 (b), one both)
 
Originally posted by nsxtasy:
Actually, reviewing the results above, it looks like about 65 percent have even wear, and about 35 percent have the centers wear faster. (13 (a), 7 (b), one both)

Ken, are you counting each respondent as one? I think those who have logged more miles and have experiences with more than one set of OEM tires should be counted based on the number of sets they are reporting ..... again, the interest in here is the findings from actual OEM sets and not percent of respondents .........

Yes, we will concede, you have more than 10 NSX drivers who are wearing their OEM tires evenly at 40 psi ........ I just want to personally meet and shake the hands while looking in the eyes of those getting 12,000 miles plus on 40 psi .......... maybe it will rub on mine too .......... LOL!
 
Originally posted by nsxtasy:
The contention being made by a few individuals on the tech list was that inflating the rear tires to the manufacturer-recommended pressures will always make the center of the tire wear first (regardless of driving style). Thus far, it appears that at least half of the respondents get even wear across the tread, which disproves that hypothesis. I would hardly call that meaningless.

I have to admit I do not really read the Tech list too much anymore and wasn't aware of any background on this survey. All I was going on was the goal stated in the initial message above - "to determine how the OEM rear tires wear when inflated using the manufacturer-recommended tire pressures."

If the goal was simply trying to show that it is possible to run OEM tires on an OEM setup car and get even wear with certain types of driving, I don't know why there was even a need to do a survey since your own experience has been that you DO get even wear with your use. Unless you don't believe yourself
smile.gif


I believe the responses reinforce my contention that the survey is meaningless for the stated goal since they show people have different results with the same model car, tire and inflation pressure but do not give any indication as to the reason for the differences.

Maybe I'm just grouchy today!

[This message has been edited by Lud (edited 28 February 2002).]
 
Originally posted by Hrant:
Ken, are you counting each respondent as one? I think those who have logged more miles and have experiences with more than one set of OEM tires should be counted based on the number of sets they are reporting .....

Okay, then you can count my response, with the rear tires wearing evenly, eleven times, one for each set of rear tires I've used.

(Hrant, you're bending over backwards trying to figure out a way to deny the results that quite a few people are reporting...)
 
Originally posted by Lud:
If the goal was simply trying to show that it is possible to run OEM tires on an OEM setup car and get even wear with certain types of driving, I don't know why there was even a need to do a survey since your own experience has been that you DO get even wear with your use. Unless you don't believe yourself

I believed it. Hrant (and Brian) didn't. So now there are 13 people that they can disbelieve. Of course, we still need to figure out how many sets of tires they are disbelieving.
biggrin.gif


I believe the responses reinforce my contention that the survey is meaningless for the stated goal since they show people have different results with the same model car, tire and inflation pressure but do not give any indication as to the reason for the differences.

If the goal were instead to figure out the reason for the differences, you're correct, we would need a lot more data - complete results on a number of variables from everyone, and probably a lot more responses than the 21 we've gotten, since we would then be "slicing and dicing" the data much thinner.
 
I've got the only solution that matters to me. I keep it aligned as best I can given that it's lowered. I run the pressures where they feel right for the driving I'm doing. I run the piss out of the car whenever possible. And I replace the bloody tires whenever they need it.

Maybe I'm grumpy too.
 
Back
Top