- Joined
- 9 January 2013
- Messages
- 257
Why should the comparison of the electronics of a 2005 NSX to a 2003 RS6 be "crazy"? The only thing that's crazy about the comparison is that the NSX electronics suck compared to the two year older Audi.....lol. My 2003 RS6 sedan that weighs at least 1000lbs more than the NSX will embarrass it in every performance comparison except for cornering.
The NSX was an awesome platform in its day. I'll always have mine and I truly enjoy every minute I'm driving it or even just looking at it in the garage. But c'mon, be realistic when comparing it to other cars. Audi is probably putting out the best cars in the world right now. Honda/Acura has some pretty big shoes to fill with the new NSX that they have been releasing for how many years now? From V8 to V10 and now back to a V6 they have flip flopped on this new car and in my opinion embarrassed themselves in the process. They really better bring their A Game since the next gen R8 is possibly going to have the twin turbo RS7 motor which is running 10 sec 1/4 mile times in an almost 4000lb car.
I just recently sold my Cayenne S and picked up an MDX.....which one of those do you think is a more solid car?
I believe just like anything else it's all about personal preference. If I had to choose between a 2005 nsx and a 2003 rs6, I would absolutely without a doubt in my mind pick the nsx for many reasons. Off the top of my head those reasons include: timeless design, rarity, reliability, driving experience, resale value, did I mention timeless design? :biggrin: