NSX-GUY said:
I have no idea what kind of judicial system you guys have over there or WHY your "solicitor" would be so confident, but without a receipt for your payment how can you even stand a chance ?
If he is as disreputable as you portray him to be he'll simply play dumb and tell the court he has no idea who you even ARE !!!
And, if you DO get the local paper to run an article (which I doubt) both they AND you may be subject to libel unless you can PROVE he did what you claim he did.
Good luck to you
a bit of history.
He is taking me to court,i'm counter-claiming.
He has stated in writing for the court, 2 different times that the car was finished.end of october and end of december.Two full months apart,so he is obviously lying about one of them,therfor the judge knows he is dealing with a guy that is capable of lying.
He sent a letter to the judge(i also had a copy)stating that he had arranged for my car to be viewed by the manufacturer of the paint that was applied to my car,when in fact he has never contacted them.they have provided proof of this in writing to me,on company headed paper.
In his initial claim form he stated the car was completed in december and then i was invoiced.what he did not know was,i had had work done on my car in mid november and the garage that worked on my car would testify as to the colour on my car when he worked on it.my car was initially silver and then it eas re-sprayed to blue/purple.it was blue/purple when he worked on it.
and the gaps in his defence just go on and on and on.this is why my solicitor is confident.
regarding the local paper,if i lose in court then i cannot say anything,but if i win,then i have every right to do so.i think the paper would jump at the chance to expose a dodgy bodyshop that rips off it's customers.