i've always thought that nsx's don't get their justice in most pictures..... you just have to see them in real life and next to other cars to really appreciate them. as far as the looks being outdated.... ask somebody who only knows about the looks (ie, has no idea what the car is). they won't be able to tell you if it's a 91 or a 2006. unless your car is a daily driver and is beat up some :tongue:
but that's just the looks. nobody ever mentions the engine of this thing. it is the year 2006. you have station wagons with more hp than an nsx. and most cars half its price will rape it in a straight line (not beat it, RAPE it). i'm not saying that the nsx doesn't have its high points, but cmon, when you're spending 90g on a car, i'd expect it to kill most things on the street. around corners
and at a light. this is why i could never justify spending 90 g's on it (besides the fact that i don't have that kind of money
) in 1991 270hp and 14sec qm was
in 2006, 270 hp and 14 sec qm can be found in a nissan maxima.
the interior of the nsx looks damn good. compare the nsx to a ferrari or borg in any regard and it may get beat..... except the interior.... that's something exotics dont' have: nice interiors. they are garbage, but the nsx's looks nice. there is nothing outdated about the interior. oh, and by the way, ALL american cars' interiors look cheap and crappy too. somehow they still don't get it.
all in all, honda turned their back on the nsx. but then again..... why change something that holds up through the years.... if it is becoming outdated, it is only right now that it is apparent (cause even in the mid/late 90's..... what was better?)
