The flow of wind at speed around the car is irrelevant, the car is not traveling fast enough to take advantage of a "ram air" phenomenon, and even if it were, it does not have a scoop or shaped duct to induce compression.
At nsx speeds, say around 150mph, assuming an ideal situation with a loss-less conversion of velocity to intake pressure, the potential benefit from ram air would be less than 1% - this is with an ideal system. If you were going 300mph, you could see a benefit from ram-air, but you would need a different intake configuration for your rocket-powered nsx.
I am not sure of the available dimensions within the fender, but it would perhaps be better to locate the cone element above the scoop, or in front of it, to avoid direct road-debris -> element flow, which will greatly increase the rate at which the air filter becomes dirty and requires servicing (which will require the removal of the wheel and fender liner). If the element were in front of the scoop, it would still be insulated from the engine bay, it would still have a huge reserve of cool air to draw from, and it would last perhaps twice as long between cleanings, which means less service on the owner's part, and greater performance between service (as the element is not dirty).
I spent some time researching various muffler's and their flow rates a few months ago, when I had a system fabricated for my '94; one of the items I found surprising was the flow bench testing of a straight 2.25" pipe, 14" in length, compared to various scorpion generic mufflers of a similar length. One of the mufflers they were flow testing consistently outperformed the straight pipe, which on the surface makes little sense, until the testers dissected the muffler, and discovered internally the muffler used a 3" pipe, and only the external flanges were 2.25". The longer a pipe, the more restrictive even a straight pipe can be, so by flaring out the mid section of this intake pipe, the car could see a significant benefit.
I look forward to the dyno results from this system. For the version 2 intake you mentioned you were working on, perhaps try incorporating these enhancements; a flared mid-section, a relocated filter element forward of the side scoop, and a ceramic coating to reduce heat soak.
OT: congrats on 1,000 posts