Someone recently told me I should try running Rec 90 in my 91 nsx. Is this a bad idea? I know the manual calls for 91 octane but gas with no ethanol sounds interesting.
As with all things in life, it will be a trade-off. The slightly higher energy content in gasoline versus ethanol would theoretically result in slightly lower fuel consumption. However, the energy difference between a gallon of 90/10% gas / ethanol and a gallon of 100% gas is small - do the math. That improvement could be offset by the loss in efficiency if the EMS pulls the ignition timing to prevent knock. That will depend on how the OP drives. If they never drive aggressively enough to induce detonation on the REC 90, then there might be no down side.
The OP is from Florida, so this is probably not an issue for them; but, if you live in a colder climate and store your car for a significant period of the year, pure gas as opposed to an ethanol blend can prevent the nasty effects of phase separation that can occur if the ethanol component in the gas has taken on any moisture.
In Oct 2013 I drove from Belle Vernon PA to Raleigh NC for NSXPO and back to Vancouver on 10 % ethanol 91 octane.
The mileage was less than 1% lower than driving on 91 octane ethanol free for the previous 3420 miles.
Would rather have the protection of higher octane (with or without ethanol) than risk detonation.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.