- Joined
- 28 November 2009
- Messages
- 997
Did i dream this but did i read somewhere that the rear bank fuel rail runs a little lean well when in comparison to the front rail?
So fuel comes from the fuel filter, goes to the front fuel rail which then feeds the the rear.
How about this for an idea, coming straight off the fuel filter to the a Y splitter then feeding both the front and rear fuel rails at the banjo's which joins both the front and where banks and capping off the original fuel feed on the front rail.
I've not tried this but could you even swap front and rear rails flipping then 180 degree and doing the same thing.
The only thing is then the FPR would be on the opposite side so you would have to run a longer hose to that.
I'm sure the original setup is fine for NA but when running boost with more fuel surely a 50/50 balance of fuel between the 2 rails would make sense?
I'm just thinking out loud, i don't think i'm at the point of changing my fueling side of things beyond what i already have.
So fuel comes from the fuel filter, goes to the front fuel rail which then feeds the the rear.
How about this for an idea, coming straight off the fuel filter to the a Y splitter then feeding both the front and rear fuel rails at the banjo's which joins both the front and where banks and capping off the original fuel feed on the front rail.
I've not tried this but could you even swap front and rear rails flipping then 180 degree and doing the same thing.
The only thing is then the FPR would be on the opposite side so you would have to run a longer hose to that.
I'm sure the original setup is fine for NA but when running boost with more fuel surely a 50/50 balance of fuel between the 2 rails would make sense?
I'm just thinking out loud, i don't think i'm at the point of changing my fueling side of things beyond what i already have.
Last edited: