I don't think he is running out of HP, I think he is running out of gears.
Shoot your right, brain fart.
I don't think he is running out of HP, I think he is running out of gears.
Is that F40 stock? A stock F40 will top out at 200-201mph. I'm sure a 600whp NSX can easily break 200mph.
Is that F40 stock? A stock F40 will top out at 200-201mph. I'm sure a 600whp NSX can easily break 200mph.
Nothing breaks 200mph easy..........
^ +1 - not even the Veyron - so I would seriously doubt if the NSX could break 200 even with this 600+ hp. It took miles and 1000 hp for the Veyron to do it. I'd have to see it clocked to believe it.
What gearing would that take Clr?
As the previous owner of an R6, I can tell you that no NSX will pull on an R1.
Not on any day, not in any conditions, not with any driver, not ever.
An R1 with Rosie O'Donnell on the back, Kirstie Alley on the handle bars and William the Refrigerator Perry at the helm, would blow the doors clean off a turbo NSX. Trust me.
Please take that quote back!!! Never say Never!
Not an NSX but still, car can beat bike!
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GBCPN2jNPDg&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GBCPN2jNPDg&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KNqa_1syyFU&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KNqa_1syyFU&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
At 3000 pounds, a car needs around 700+hp to run with a well-ridden late model liter bike. However, the rider in question may have screwed up a little (shifting too soon, etc) and it may have been an older R1. It's difficult to get max acceleration from a liter bike--they're not optimised for it. I remember a test where they took a stock 9.9 e.t. bike and modded it only for better traction and less wheelie tendency. On the stock motor, it did 9.40s.
Either way, nice kill, vega$nsx. Even if he'd done everything right, you'd have caught him after 150mph, guaranteed. Nice car!
Nowadays, it's not that hard to build a car with 1000hp, which will outdrag any stock bike. On the other hand, one can easily buy and build a very reliable $20k 'busa that can do 8s.
I once raced a 600hp Viper in my R1. I had to let off momentarily in 1st to get the front wheel down. A little flustered, I then short shifted into 2nd, where I had to let off a little because the front came up again. I still beat him by 3-4 car lengths.
The Veyron needed over a 1000HP to get to 250+ MPH, because it was heavy and had a relatively high drag coefficient. The Mclaren F1 got to 240 mph with about 630hp and that was at the fly wheel.
There is a huge difference in power required for a car to get to 200mph versus 250 mph, because the drag is a function of the velocity squared. The coefficient of drag for the Mclaren F1 is .32 and weighs ~ 2500lbs , the Veyron has a .36 drag coefficient and weighs almost 4500lbs. Stock NSX has CD of .32, although I think VegasNSX might be higher due to the widebody....weight as we all know stock is about 3000lbs, again think his car is also lighter than stock...so without taking into account lift and downforce, I think with the right gearing his car could hit 200 mph. Just my $.02:smile:
Weight plays a very small role in top speed - it affects acceleration, which may make somewhat of a difference of how long it takes you to get to a certain speed... but main factors in achieving ultimate top speed are (in order of importance): drag, power, gearing.
I realize this, I suppose I should of alluded to why it takes the Veyron so long to get to 250+ mph even with 1001 hp was because it was a pig.
That being said, you basically hit the point that the NSX has a much lower coefficient of drag than a Mclaren F1
The coeffiecient of drag for the NSX and Mclaren are the same, it's the Veyron's that's higher.
Nothing breaks 200mph easy..........
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/KNqa_1syyFU&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/KNqa_1syyFU&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
I realize this, I suppose I should of alluded to why it takes the Veyron so long to get to 250+ mph even with 1001 hp was because it was a pig.
The coeffiecient of drag for the NSX and Mclaren are the same, it's the Veyron's that's higher.
Oops typo, I meant to reference the Veyron in that sentence, not the F1.
^ i think that when we talk about something, we better know it for sure. Did you ever did top speed runs with an NSX ??... well, i DID. I ended my 5th gear, ie 5th gear fuel cutoff at 8000 true rpm (about 8050 read) and after some calculations, the speed was 307km/h (190mp/h)... being 200mph = 320km/h, so i was like 13km/h short ... ohhh and that was at nigh with my popups lifted (talk about drag)
And this was with my almost stock NSX. The only mods were no cats, a KN filter and a CF fender intake duct to the OEM intake box.
what i can tell you, is that the NSX is rock solid at that speed... one thing that amazes me in the NSX is that the faster it goes, the more you feel it "glued" to the road... i can only imagine it with good aero upgrades such as flat bottom and 02+ front end...
our prime friend greenberet did, and i think he still does, some runs on the autobahn, and he has videos of it, doing 301km/h in a flat area.... i did it in a small downhill in a deserted highway (didn't saw a single car during the whole time).
So... from ACTUAL personal experience, the NSX is structurally more than capable of those speeds... it only lacks the power to do it easily.
PS - and that part of parts starting to loose bits and parts imploding..man...please...get real...
There are alot of strange science and scientists on this thread......